» Articles » PMID: 37237580

Machine Learning for Optical Motion Capture-Driven Musculoskeletal Modelling from Inertial Motion Capture Data

Overview
Date 2023 May 27
PMID 37237580
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Marker-based Optical Motion Capture (OMC) systems and associated musculoskeletal (MSK) modelling predictions offer non-invasively obtainable insights into muscle and joint loading at an in vivo level, aiding clinical decision-making. However, an OMC system is lab-based, expensive, and requires a line of sight. Inertial Motion Capture (IMC) techniques are widely-used alternatives, which are portable, user-friendly, and relatively low-cost, although with lesser accuracy. Irrespective of the choice of motion capture technique, one typically uses an MSK model to obtain the kinematic and kinetic outputs, which is a computationally expensive tool increasingly well approximated by machine learning (ML) methods. Here, an ML approach is presented that maps experimentally recorded IMC input data to the human upper-extremity MSK model outputs computed from ('gold standard') OMC input data. Essentially, this proof-of-concept study aims to predict higher-quality MSK outputs from the much easier-to-obtain IMC data. We use OMC and IMC data simultaneously collected for the same subjects to train different ML architectures that predict OMC-driven MSK outputs from IMC measurements. In particular, we employed various neural network (NN) architectures, such as Feed-Forward Neural Networks (FFNNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) (vanilla, Long Short-Term Memory, and Gated Recurrent Unit) and a comprehensive search for the best-fit model in the hyperparameters space in both subject-exposed (SE) as well as subject-naive (SN) settings. We observed a comparable performance for both FFNN and RNN models, which have a high degree of agreement (ravg,SE,FFNN=0.90±0.19, ravg,SE,RNN=0.89±0.17, ravg,SN,FFNN=0.84±0.23, and ravg,SN,RNN=0.78±0.23) with the desired OMC-driven MSK estimates for held-out test data. The findings demonstrate that mapping IMC inputs to OMC-driven MSK outputs using ML models could be instrumental in transitioning MSK modelling from 'lab to field'.

Citing Articles

Gait Recognition and Assistance Parameter Prediction Determination Based on Kinematic Information Measured by Inertial Measurement Units.

Xiang Q, Wang J, Liu Y, Guo S, Liu L Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(3).

PMID: 38534549 PMC: 10967849. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11030275.


Predicting Tissue Loads in Running from Inertial Measurement Units.

Rasmussen J, Skejo S, Waagepetersen R Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(24).

PMID: 38139682 PMC: 10747732. DOI: 10.3390/s23249836.

References
1.
Delp S, Anderson F, Arnold A, Loan P, Habib A, John C . OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007; 54(11):1940-50. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2007.901024. View

2.
Konrath J, Karatsidis A, Schepers H, Bellusci G, Zee M, Andersen M . Estimation of the Knee Adduction Moment and Joint Contact Force during Daily Living Activities Using Inertial Motion Capture. Sensors (Basel). 2019; 19(7). PMC: 6480627. DOI: 10.3390/s19071681. View

3.
Cronin N . Using deep neural networks for kinematic analysis: Challenges and opportunities. J Biomech. 2021; 123:110460. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110460. View

4.
Rau G, Disselhorst-Klug C, Schmidt R . Movement biomechanics goes upwards: from the leg to the arm. J Biomech. 2000; 33(10):1207-16. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00062-2. View

5.
Anglin C, Wyss U . Review of arm motion analyses. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2000; 214(5):541-55. DOI: 10.1243/0954411001535570. View