» Articles » PMID: 37234566

Perceived Message Effectiveness of Cigar Warning Themes Among Adults in the United States

Overview
Journal Prev Med Rep
Date 2023 May 26
PMID 37234566
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Most tobacco warnings focus on health harms to the consumer, but other message themes may be promising. We assessed perceived message effectiveness (PME) among adults who smoke cigars for 12 cigar warning statements to discourage smoking, and measured PME across four message themes: , , , and . Between April 23 and May 7, 2020, we conducted an online study with U.S. adults who used any cigar type in the past 30 days (n = 777). Participants were randomly assigned to view two out of 12 warnings and rate each one on PME. We analyzed PME mean ratings (range 1 [low] to 5 [high]). The warning statements for lung cancer ( = 3.91) and heart disease ( = 3.77) had the highest PME ratings; secondhand smoke ( = 3.50) and formaldehyde ( = 3.48) had the lowest PME ratings. Multilevel analyses showed that the theme was associated with higher PME ratings compared to other warning themes ( < 0.05 for and ) except ( =.16). Higher awareness of consequences was associated with higher PME ratings ( <.001). Higher nicotine dependence was also associated with higher PME ratings ( = .004). Warning statements with information addressing the themes of health harms and toxicity could potentially inform those who smoke cigars about the broader harms of cigar use and should be considered in FDA labeling regulations for cigars.

Citing Articles

Impact of warning pictorials and size on perceived effectiveness of cigar warning labels in a nationally representative between-subjects experiment.

Goldstein A, Yang M, Jarman K, Queen T, Clark S, Ranney L BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e088482.

PMID: 39819948 PMC: 11752031. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088482.


Identifying attributes of effective cigar warnings: a choice-based conjoint experiment in an online survey of US adults who smoke cigars.

Jarman K, Kistler C, Thrasher J, Kowitt S, Ranney L, Ross J BMJ Open. 2024; 14(12):e088525.

PMID: 39658281 PMC: 11647390. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088525.


Cigar-Specific Health Warnings: Attention, Recall, and Perceived Effectiveness Among Young Adult Users and Non-Users.

Klein E, Driscoll A, Shoben A, Macisco J, Pike Moore S, Quisenberry A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(11).

PMID: 39595709 PMC: 11593392. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21111442.


Does noticing cigar warnings associate with cigar harm perceptions and smoking behaviors? Analysis from Wave 5 of the population assessment of tobacco and health study.

Gratale S, Chen-Sankey J, Ganz O, Teotia A, Strasser A, Schroth K Addict Behav. 2024; 152:107958.

PMID: 38290323 PMC: 11166231. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.107958.

References
1.
Jolly D . Exploring the use of little cigars by students at a historically black university. Prev Chronic Dis. 2008; 5(3):A82. PMC: 2483573. View

2.
Hall M, Ribisl K, Brewer N . Smokers' and nonsmokers' beliefs about harmful tobacco constituents: implications for FDA communication efforts. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013; 16(3):343-50. PMC: 3920339. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntt158. View

3.
Cho Y, Thrasher J, Yong H, Szklo A, OConnor R, Bansal-Travers M . Path analysis of warning label effects on negative emotions and quit attempts: A longitudinal study of smokers in Australia, Canada, Mexico, and the US. Soc Sci Med. 2017; 197:226-234. PMC: 5758420. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.003. View

4.
Baig S, Noar S, Gottfredson N, Boynton M, Ribisl K, Brewer N . UNC Perceived Message Effectiveness: Validation of a Brief Scale. Ann Behav Med. 2018; 53(8):732-742. PMC: 6636889. DOI: 10.1093/abm/kay080. View

5.
Koszowski B, Rosenberry Z, Kanu A, Viray L, Potts J, Pickworth W . Nicotine and carbon monoxide exposure from inhalation of cigarillo smoke. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2015; 139(Pt A):7-14. PMC: 4662635. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2015.10.007. View