» Articles » PMID: 37233399

Association of Rurality, Socioeconomic Status, and Race with Pancreatic Cancer Surgical Treatment and Survival

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 May 26
PMID 37233399
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Pancreatectomy is a necessary component of curative intent therapy for pancreatic cancer, and patients living in nonmetropolitan areas may face barriers to accessing timely surgical care. We evaluated the intersecting associations of rurality, socioeconomic status (SES), and race on treatment and outcomes of Medicare beneficiaries with pancreatic cancer.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study, using fee-for-service Medicare claims of beneficiaries with incident pancreatic cancer (2016-2018). We categorized beneficiary place of residence as metropolitan, micropolitan, or rural. Measures of SES were Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility and the Area Deprivation Index. Primary study outcomes were receipt of pancreatectomy and 1-year mortality. Exposure-outcome associations were assessed with competing risks and logistic regression.

Results: We identified 45 915 beneficiaries with pancreatic cancer, including 78.4%, 10.9%, and 10.7% residing in metropolitan, micropolitan, and rural areas, respectively. In analyses adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity, and metastasis, residents of micropolitan and rural areas were less likely to undergo pancreatectomy (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio = 0.88 for rural, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.81 to 0.95) and had higher 1-year mortality (adjusted odds ratio = 1.25 for rural, 95% CI = 1.17 to 1.33) compared with metropolitan residents. Adjustment for measures of SES attenuated the association of nonmetropolitan residence with mortality, and there was no statistically significant association of rurality with pancreatectomy after adjustment. Black beneficiaries had lower likelihood of pancreatectomy than White, non-Hispanic beneficiaries (subdistribution hazard ratio = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.72 to 0.89, adjusted for SES). One-year mortality in metropolitan areas was higher for Black beneficiaries (adjusted odds ratio = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.26).

Conclusions: Rurality, socioeconomic deprivation, and race have complex interrelationships and are associated with disparities in pancreatic cancer treatment and outcomes.

Citing Articles

Sources of perceived social support and cognitive function among older adults: a longitudinal study in rural China.

Gui S, Wang J, Li Q, Chen H, Jiang Z, Hu J Front Aging Neurosci. 2024; 16:1443689.

PMID: 39444805 PMC: 11496072. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1443689.


Pancreatic cancer mortality trends in the United States: how much have we moved the needle?.

Tan J, Yeo Y, Ng W, Chiang C, Stucky C, Wasif N J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024; 15(4):1789-1795.

PMID: 39279936 PMC: 11399823. DOI: 10.21037/jgo-24-213.


Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Occurrence and Outcomes in Rural United States: A Scoping Review.

Njoku A, Sawadogo W, Frimpong P Cancer Control. 2024; 31:10732748241261558.

PMID: 38857181 PMC: 11165954. DOI: 10.1177/10732748241261558.


Same People, Different Results: Categorizing Cancer Registry Cases Across the Rural-Urban Continuum.

Schiefelbein A, Krebsbach J, Taylor A, Haimson A, Varley P, Skala M WMJ. 2024; 123(2):78-87.

PMID: 38718234 PMC: 11406676.


Pancreatic Cancer Health Disparity: Pharmacologic Anthropology.

Wall N, Fuller R, Morcos A, De Leon M Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(20).

PMID: 37894437 PMC: 10605341. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15205070.

References
1.
Eppsteiner R, Csikesz N, McPhee J, Tseng J, Shah S . Surgeon volume impacts hospital mortality for pancreatic resection. Ann Surg. 2009; 249(4):635-40. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ed958. View

2.
Wasif N, Etzioni D, Habermann E, Mathur A, Pockaj B, Gray R . Racial and Socioeconomic Differences in the Use of High-Volume Commission on Cancer-Accredited Hospitals for Cancer Surgery in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018; 25(5):1116-1125. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6374-0. View

3.
Onega T, Duell E, Shi X, Wang D, Demidenko E, Goodman D . Geographic access to cancer care in the U.S. Cancer. 2008; 112(4):909-18. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23229. View

4.
Kind A, Buckingham W . Making Neighborhood-Disadvantage Metrics Accessible - The Neighborhood Atlas. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(26):2456-2458. PMC: 6051533. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1802313. View

5.
Burmeister E, Waterhouse M, Jordan S, OConnell D, Merrett N, Goldstein D . Determinants of survival and attempted resection in patients with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer: An Australian population-based study. Pancreatology. 2016; 16(5):873-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2016.06.010. View