» Articles » PMID: 37229510

Effects of Syllable Rate on Neuro-Behavioral Synchronization Across Modalities: Brain Oscillations and Speech Productions

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2023 May 25
PMID 37229510
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Considerable work suggests the dominant syllable rhythm of the acoustic envelope is remarkably similar across languages (∼4-5 Hz) and that oscillatory brain activity tracks these quasiperiodic rhythms to facilitate speech processing. However, whether this fundamental periodicity represents a common organizing principle in both auditory and motor systems involved in speech has not been explicitly tested. To evaluate relations between entrainment in the perceptual and production domains, we measured individuals' (i) neuroacoustic tracking of the EEG to speech trains and their (ii) simultaneous and non-simultaneous productions synchronized to syllable rates between 2.5 and 8.5 Hz. Productions made without concurrent auditory presentation isolated motor speech functions more purely. We show that neural synchronization flexibly adapts to the heard stimuli in a rate-dependent manner, but that phase locking is boosted near ∼4.5 Hz, the purported dominant rate of speech. Cued speech productions (recruit sensorimotor interaction) were optimal between 2.5 and 4.5 Hz, suggesting a low-frequency constraint on motor output and/or sensorimotor integration. In contrast, "pure" motor productions (without concurrent sound cues) were most precisely generated at rates of 4.5 and 5.5 Hz, paralleling the neuroacoustic data. Correlations further revealed strong links between receptive (EEG) and production synchronization abilities; individuals with stronger auditory-perceptual entrainment better matched speech rhythms motorically. Together, our findings support an intimate link between exogenous and endogenous rhythmic processing that is optimized at 4-5 Hz in both auditory and motor systems. Parallels across modalities could result from dynamics of the speech motor system coupled with experience-dependent tuning of the perceptual system via the sensorimotor interface.

Citing Articles

Cross-linguistic and acoustic-driven effects on multiscale neural synchrony to stress rhythms.

He D, Buder E, Bidelman G Brain Lang. 2024; 256:105463.

PMID: 39243486 PMC: 11422791. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105463.


Auditory-motor synchronization and perception suggest partially distinct time scales in speech and music.

Barchet A, Henry M, Pelofi C, Rimmele J Commun Psychol. 2024; 2(1):2.

PMID: 39242963 PMC: 11332030. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-023-00053-6.


A multimodal approach to automated hierarchical assessment of bulbar involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Rong P, Heidrick L, Pattee G Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1396002.

PMID: 38836001 PMC: 11148322. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1396002.


Effects of Stimulus Rate and Periodicity on Auditory Cortical Entrainment to Continuous Sounds.

Momtaz S, Bidelman G eNeuro. 2024; 11(3).

PMID: 38253583 PMC: 10913036. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0027-23.2024.


Cross-linguistic and acoustic-driven effects on multiscale neural synchrony to stress rhythms.

He D, Buder E, Bidelman G bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 38106017 PMC: 10723321. DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.04.570012.

References
1.
Wilson S, Saygin A, Sereno M, Iacoboni M . Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production. Nat Neurosci. 2004; 7(7):701-2. DOI: 10.1038/nn1263. View

2.
Tilsen S, Johnson K . Low-frequency Fourier analysis of speech rhythm. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008; 124(2):EL34-9. PMC: 5570052. DOI: 10.1121/1.2947626. View

3.
Nourski K, Reale R, Oya H, Kawasaki H, Kovach C, Chen H . Temporal envelope of time-compressed speech represented in the human auditory cortex. J Neurosci. 2009; 29(49):15564-74. PMC: 2851231. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3065-09.2009. View

4.
Bidelman G, Moreno S, Alain C . Tracing the emergence of categorical speech perception in the human auditory system. Neuroimage. 2013; 79:201-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.093. View

5.
Poeppel D, Assaneo M . Speech rhythms and their neural foundations. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2020; 21(6):322-334. DOI: 10.1038/s41583-020-0304-4. View