» Articles » PMID: 37228657

Efficacy and Safety of Prolonged Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients

Overview
Journal Glob Heart
Publisher Ubiquity Press
Date 2023 May 25
PMID 37228657
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: It remains controversial whether to extend the course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We conducted a study to investigate the benefits and risks of applying DAPT for different durations after PCI in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients in China. What's more, we explored the efficacy of extended DAPT regimen based on ticagrelor.

Methods: This single-center prospective cohort study used data obtained from the PHARM-ACS Patient Registration Database. We included all patients who were discharged between April and December 2018. All patients had at least 18 months of follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups according to the duration of DAPT: a 1-year group and a >1-year group. Potential bias between the two groups was adjusted for by propensity score matching using logistic regression. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke occurring from 12 months after discharge to follow-up visit. The safety endpoint was any significant bleeding event (BARC ≥ 2).

Results: Of 3,205 patients enrolled, 2,201 (68.67%) had DAPT prolonged beyond one year. A total of 2,000 patients were successfully propensity score-matched; patients who received DAPT > 1-year (n = 1000), compared with DAPT = 1-year patients (n = 1000), had a similar risk of MACCE (adjusted HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.05-1.10) and significant bleeding events (adjusted HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.32-1.24). The DAPT > 1-year group had a higher risk of revascularization (adjusted HR 3.36, 95% CI 1.64-6.87).

Conclusion: Prolonged DAPT may not be of sufficient benefit to ACS patients within 12-18 months after the index PCI to offset the increased risk of significant bleeding events.

References
1.
. [Chinese Society of Cardiology and Chinese College of Cardiovascular Physicians Expert Consensus statement on dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2021; 49(5):432-454. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20210125-00088. View

2.
Zheng B, Huo Y, Lee S, Sawhney J, Kim H, Krittayaphong R . Long-term antithrombotic management patterns in Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome: 2-year observations from the EPICOR Asia study. Clin Cardiol. 2020; 43(9):999-1008. PMC: 7462192. DOI: 10.1002/clc.23400. View

3.
Pereira N, Rihal C, Lennon R, Marcus G, Shrivastava S, Bell M . Effect of CYP2C19 Genotype on Ischemic Outcomes During Oral P2Y Inhibitor Therapy: A Meta-Analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021; 14(7):739-750. PMC: 9853943. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.01.024. View

4.
Zhang Y, Peng W, Shi X, Han J, Wang Y, Fang Z . Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel in Older Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From a Real-World Registry. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:859962. PMC: 8964993. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.859962. View

5.
Costa F, van Klaveren D, James S, Heg D, Raber L, Feres F . Derivation and validation of the predicting bleeding complications in patients undergoing stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score: a pooled analysis of individual-patient datasets from clinical trials. Lancet. 2017; 389(10073):1025-1034. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30397-5. View