» Articles » PMID: 37228067

Prevalence of Osteoporosis in Spinal Surgery Patients Older Than 50 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2023 May 25
PMID 37228067
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: In spine surgery, poor bone condition is associated with several complications like adjacent segment fractures, proximal junctional kyphosis, and screw loosening. Our study explored the prevalence of osteoporosis in spinal surgery patients older than 50 years through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the PRISMA criteria. Three electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, were searched from inception to August 2022. We used the random-effects model to calculate the overall estimates, and the heterogeneity was measured using Cochran's Q and I2 tests. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were used to determine the source of the heterogeneity.

Results: Based on the inclusion and criteria, we chose ten studies with 2958 individuals for our analysis. The prevalence of osteoporosis, osteopenia, and osteoporosis/osteopenia in the spinal surgery patients was 34.2% (95%CI: 24.5%-44.6%), 43.5% (95%CI: 39.8%-47.2%), and 78.7% (95%CI: 69.0%-87.0%), respectively. Regarding different diagnoses, the prevalence was highest in patients with lumbar scoliosis (55.8%; 95%CI: 46.8%-64.7%) and the lowest in patients with cervical disc herniation (12.9%; 95%CI: 8.1%-18.7%). In age groups 50-59, 50-69,70-79, the prevalence was 27.8%, 60.4%, 75.4% in females, and 18.9%, 17.4%, 26.1% in males.

Conclusions: This study showed a high prevalence of osteoporosis in patients undergoing spine surgery, especially in females, people of older age, and patients who received degenerative scoliosis and compression fractures. Current osteoporosis screening standards for patients undergoing spine surgery may not be adequate. Orthopedic specialists should make more efforts regarding preoperative osteoporosis screening and treatment.

Citing Articles

Undetected low bone mineral density in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery-prevalence and risk factors.

Kohli P, Hambrecht J, Zhu J, Chiapparelli E, Schonnagel L, Guven A N Am Spine Soc J. 2025; 21:100591.

PMID: 40041543 PMC: 11876750. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100591.


Obesity Limits Utility of Vertebral Bone Quality Score for Opportunistic Osteopenia/Osteoporosis Screening in Cervical Surgery Patients.

Shi M, Ye C, Niu B, Xie D, Chen Q, Zhao Q Global Spine J. 2025; :21925682251325181.

PMID: 40022651 PMC: 11873305. DOI: 10.1177/21925682251325181.


Age- and gender-dependent impact of titanium vertebral augmentation implants combined with cementing on subsequent vertebral fracture incidence: A comparative study with cementing alone.

Sun C, Yang Y, Lan C, Tran H, Pham T, Chiang Y Eur Spine J. 2024; 33(12):4513-4520.

PMID: 39367177 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08504-2.


A Bone Health Optimization Framework for Malaysia: a position paper by the Malaysian Bone Health Optimization Network (MyBONe).

Lee J, Leong J, Thong F, Sharifudin M, Abbas A, Kamudin N Arch Osteoporos. 2024; 19(1):88.

PMID: 39304537 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01448-6.


Oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral screw fixation and stress endplate augmentation for treating degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with osteoporosis.

Peng X, Wang X, Li Z, Xie T, Lin R, Ran L Eur Spine J. 2024; 33(9):3467-3475.

PMID: 39138674 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08401-8.


References
1.
Mikula A, Lakomkin N, Pennington Z, Pinter Z, Nassr A, Freedman B . Association between lower Hounsfield units and proximal junctional kyphosis and failure at the upper thoracic spine. J Neurosurg Spine. 2022; 37(5):694-702. DOI: 10.3171/2022.3.SPINE22197. View

2.
Pappou I, Girardi F, Sandhu H, Parvataneni H, Cammisa Jr F, Schneider R . Discordantly high spinal bone mineral density values in patients with adult lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(14):1614-20. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000222030.32171.5f. View

3.
Ponnusamy K, Iyer S, Gupta G, Khanna A . Instrumentation of the osteoporotic spine: biomechanical and clinical considerations. Spine J. 2010; 11(1):54-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.09.024. View

4.
Loffler M, Jacob A, Scharr A, Sollmann N, Burian E, El Husseini M . Automatic opportunistic osteoporosis screening in routine CT: improved prediction of patients with prevalent vertebral fractures compared to DXA. Eur Radiol. 2021; 31(8):6069-6077. PMC: 8270840. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07655-2. View

5.
St Jeor J, Jackson T, Xiong A, Kadri A, Freedman B, Sebastian A . Osteoporosis in spine surgery patients: what is the best way to diagnose osteoporosis in this population?. Neurosurg Focus. 2020; 49(2):E4. DOI: 10.3171/2020.5.FOCUS20277. View