» Articles » PMID: 37226748

Do Physicians Have a Duty to Discuss Expanded Access to Investigational Drugs with Their Patients? A Normative Analysis

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Drawing on ethical and legal frameworks in the Netherlands, the United States and France, we examine whether physicians are expected to inform patients about potentially relevant opportunities for expanded access to investigational drugs. While we found no definitive legal obligation, we argue that physicians have a moral obligation to discuss opportunities for expanded access with patients who have run out of treatment options to prevent inequality, to promote autonomy, and to achieve beneficence.

Citing Articles

Devil in the Details: Physician Duties and Expanded Access.

Lynch H J Law Med Ethics. 2023; 51(1):181-184.

PMID: 37226759 PMC: 10209988. DOI: 10.1017/jme.2023.54.

References
1.
Bateman-House A, Robertson C . The Federal Right to Try Act of 2017-A Wrong Turn for Access to Investigational Drugs and the Path Forward. JAMA Intern Med. 2018; 178(3):321-322. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8167. View

2.
Launet Q, Brouard A, Doreau C . [Drugs under temporary use authorisation: 50 years of French drug development]. Rev Hist Pharm (Paris). 2004; 52(341):47-54. DOI: 10.3406/pharm.2004.5596. View

3.
Notarangelo L . Primary immunodeficiencies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010; 125(2 Suppl 2):S182-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.07.053. View

4.
Kimberly L, Beuttler M, Shen M, Caplan A, Bateman-House A . Pre-approval Access Terminology: A Cause for Confusion and a Danger to Patients. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018; 51(4):494-500. DOI: 10.1177/2168479017696267. View

5.
Turcios N . Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease: An Overview. Respir Care. 2019; 65(2):233-251. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.06697. View