» Articles » PMID: 37225358

Screening for Dilated Cardiomyopathy In At-Risk First-Degree Relatives

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular screening is recommended for first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), but the yield of FDR screening is uncertain for DCM patients without known familial DCM, for non-White FDRs, or for DCM partial phenotypes of left ventricular enlargement (LVE) or left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).

Objectives: This study examined the yield of clinical screening among reportedly unaffected FDRs of DCM patients.

Methods: Adult FDRs of DCM patients at 25 sites completed screening echocardiograms and ECGs. Mixed models accounting for site heterogeneity and intrafamilial correlation were used to compare screen-based percentages of DCM, LVSD, or LVE by FDR demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, and proband genetics results.

Results: A total of 1,365 FDRs were included, with a mean age of 44.8 ± 16.9 years, 27.5% non-Hispanic Black, 9.8% Hispanic, and 61.7% women. Among screened FDRs, 14.1% had new diagnoses of DCM (2.1%), LVSD (3.6%), or LVE (8.4%). The percentage of FDRs with new diagnoses was higher for those aged 45 to 64 years than 18 to 44 years. The age-adjusted percentage of any finding was higher among FDRs with hypertension and obesity but did not differ statistically by race and ethnicity (16.2% for Hispanic, 15.2% for non-Hispanic Black, and 13.1% for non-Hispanic White) or sex (14.6% for women and 12.8% for men). FDRs whose probands carried clinically reportable variants were more likely to be identified with DCM.

Conclusions: Cardiovascular screening identified new DCM-related findings among 1 in 7 reportedly unaffected FDRs regardless of race and ethnicity, underscoring the value of clinical screening in all FDRs.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Women with Peripartum or Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Their First-Degree Relatives: The DCM Precision Medicine Study.

Kransdorf E, Jain R, Mead J, Haas G, Hofmeyer M, Ewald G medRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40034776 PMC: 11875307. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.18.25322501.


Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Genetic Journey from Past to Future.

Newman N, Burke M Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(21).

PMID: 39519012 PMC: 11546582. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252111460.


Risk Assessment and Personalized Treatment Options in Inherited Dilated Cardiomyopathies: A Narrative Review.

Arnautu D, Cozma D, Lala I, Arnautu S, Tomescu M, Andor M Biomedicines. 2024; 12(8).

PMID: 39200108 PMC: 11351202. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12081643.


Screening for dilated cardiomyopathy in immediate family members: to whom, how, when (and where).

Pieroni M, Ciabatti M, Zocchi C Eur Heart J Suppl. 2024; 26(Suppl 1):i93-i98.

PMID: 38784151 PMC: 11110450. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae024.


The DCM Project Portal: A direct-to-participant platform of The DCM Research Project.

Jordan E, Grover P, Lin J, Starkey C, Finley E, Ni H Am Heart J Plus. 2024; 38.

PMID: 38348286 PMC: 10861184. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100356.


References
1.
Hershberger R, Givertz M, Ho C, Judge D, Kantor P, McBride K . Genetic Evaluation of Cardiomyopathy-A Heart Failure Society of America Practice Guideline. J Card Fail. 2018; 24(5):281-302. PMC: 9903357. DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2018.03.004. View

2.
Huggins G, Kinnamon D, Haas G, Jordan E, Hofmeyer M, Kransdorf E . Prevalence and Cumulative Risk of Familial Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy. JAMA. 2022; 327(5):454-463. PMC: 8808323. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.24674. View

3.
Muller C, MacLehose R . Estimating predicted probabilities from logistic regression: different methods correspond to different target populations. Int J Epidemiol. 2014; 43(3):962-70. PMC: 4052139. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyu029. View

4.
Mahon N, Murphy R, MacRae C, Caforio A, Elliott P, McKenna W . Echocardiographic evaluation in asymptomatic relatives of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy reveals preclinical disease. Ann Intern Med. 2005; 143(2):108-15. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-2-200507190-00009. View

5.
Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J . Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015; 17(5):405-24. PMC: 4544753. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. View