» Articles » PMID: 37223710

Forty-five Years of Research on Vegetarianism and Veganism: A Systematic and Comprehensive Literature Review of Quantitative Studies

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2023 May 24
PMID 37223710
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Meat production and consumption are sources of animal cruelty, responsible for several environmental problems and human health diseases, and contribute to social inequality. Vegetarianism and veganism (VEG) are two alternatives that align with calls for a transition to more ethical, sustainable, and healthier lifestyles. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic literature review of 307 quantitative studies on VEG (from 1978 to 2023), collected from the Web of Science in the categories of psychology, behavioral science, social science, and consumer behavior. For a holistic view of the literature and to capture its multiple angles, we articulated our objectives by responding to the variables of "WHEN," "WHERE," "WHO," "WHAT," "WHY," "WHICH," and "HOW" (6W1H) regarding the VEG research. Our review highlighted that quantitative research on VEG has experienced exponential growth with an unbalanced geographical focus, accompanied by an increasing richness but also great complexity in the understating of the VEG phenomenon. The systematic literature review found different approaches from which the authors studied VEG while identifying methodological limitations. Additionally, our research provided a systematic view of factors studied on VEG and the variables associated with VEG-related behavior change. Accordingly, this study contributes to the literature in the field of VEG by mapping the most recent trends and gaps in research, clarifying existing findings, and suggesting directions for future research.

Citing Articles

A sustainable and healthy diet: Personality, motives, and sociodemographics.

Ardebili A, Rickertsen K Heliyon. 2024; 10(10):e31326.

PMID: 38818180 PMC: 11137409. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31326.


Veganism, cuisine, and class: exploring taste as a facilitator in adopting a vegan lifestyle in Santiago, Chile.

Giacoman C, Joustra C Front Sociol. 2024; 9:1356457.

PMID: 38690292 PMC: 11059991. DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1356457.


Motivations matter: moral and health-related motives indirectly relate to differential psychological health indicators among vegetarians.

Dai X, Leung A J Health Popul Nutr. 2024; 43(1):56.

PMID: 38664782 PMC: 11046848. DOI: 10.1186/s41043-024-00534-2.


The motivations and practices of vegetarian and vegan Saudis.

Alnasser A, Alomran N Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):9742.

PMID: 37328535 PMC: 10275927. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-36980-x.

References
1.
Kessler C, Michalsen A, Holler S, Murthy V, Cramer H . How empathic are vegan medical professionals compared to others? Leads from a paper-pencil-survey. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018; 72(5):780-784. DOI: 10.1038/s41430-017-0007-8. View

2.
Lea E, Worsley A . Benefits and barriers to the consumption of a vegetarian diet in Australia. Public Health Nutr. 2003; 6(5):505-11. DOI: 10.1079/PHN2002452. View

3.
Shickle D, Lewis P, Charny M, Farrow S . Differences in health, knowledge and attitudes between vegetarians and meat eaters in a random population sample. J R Soc Med. 1989; 82(1):18-20. PMC: 1291956. DOI: 10.1177/014107688908200107. View

4.
Pointke M, Ohlau M, Risius A, Pawelzik E . Plant-Based Only: Investigating Consumers' Sensory Perception, Motivation, and Knowledge of Different Plant-Based Alternative Products on the Market. Foods. 2022; 11(15). PMC: 9368216. DOI: 10.3390/foods11152339. View

5.
Hopwood C, Bleidorn W, Schwaba T, Chen S . Health, environmental, and animal rights motives for vegetarian eating. PLoS One. 2020; 15(4):e0230609. PMC: 7117663. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230609. View