» Articles » PMID: 37222857

Diagnostic Performance of Standardized Typical CT Findings for COVID-19: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Radiology
Date 2023 May 24
PMID 37222857
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To meta-analyze diagnostic performance measures of standardized typical CT findings for COVID-19 and examine these measures by region and national income.

Methods: MEDLINE and Embase were searched from January 2020 to April 2022 for diagnostic studies using the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) classification or the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) for COVID-19. Patient and study characteristics were extracted. We pooled the diagnostic performance of typical CT findings in the RSNA and CO-RADS systems and interobserver agreement. Meta-regression was performed to examine the effect of potential explanatory factors on the diagnostic performance of the typical CT findings.

Results: We included 42 diagnostic performance studies with 6777 PCR-positive and 9955 PCR-negative patients from 18 developing and 24 developed countries covering the Americas, Europe, Asia, and Africa. The pooled sensitivity was 70% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 65%, 74%; I = 92%), and the pooled specificity was 90% (95% CI 86%, 93%; I = 94%) for the typical CT findings of COVID-19. The sensitivity and specificity of the typical CT findings did not differ significantly by national income and the region of the study (p > 0.1, respectively). The pooled interobserver agreement from 19 studies was 0.72 (95% CI 0.63, 0.81; I = 99%) for the typical CT findings and 0.67 (95% CI 0.61, 0.74; I = 99%) for the overall CT classifications.

Conclusion: The standardized typical CT findings for COVID-19 provided moderate sensitivity and high specificity globally, regardless of region and national income, and were highly reproducible between radiologists.

Critical Relevance Statement: Standardized typical CT findings for COVID-19 provided a reproducible high diagnostic accuracy globally.

Key Points: Standardized typical CT findings for COVID-19 provide high sensitivity and specificity. Typical CT findings show high diagnosability regardless of region or income. The interobserver agreement for typical findings of COVID-19 is substantial.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the Accuracy of Chest CT in Detecting COVID-19 Through Tracheobronchial Wall Thickness: Insights From Emergency Department Patients in Mid-2023.

Kotoku A, Horinouchi H, Nishii T, Fukuyama M, Ohta Y, Fukuda T Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e69161.

PMID: 39398816 PMC: 11467821. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.69161.

References
1.
Bellini D, Panvini N, Rengo M, Vicini S, Lichtner M, Tieghi T . Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of CO-RADS in patients with suspected coronavirus disease-2019: a multireader validation study. Eur Radiol. 2020; 31(4):1932-1940. PMC: 7510765. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07273-y. View

2.
Olsen S, Winn A, Budd A, Prill M, Steel J, Midgley C . Changes in Influenza and Other Respiratory Virus Activity During the COVID-19 Pandemic - United States, 2020-2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021; 70(29):1013-1019. PMC: 8297694. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7029a1. View

3.
Inanc I, Bursa N, Gultepe A, Bayramoglu M, Sabanoglu C, Inanc F . Association among CO-RADS score, co-morbid diseases, and short-term prognosis in COVID-19 infection. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022; 26(2):653-663. DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202201_27892. View

4.
Arshadi M, Fardsanei F, Deihim B, Farshadzadeh Z, Nikkhahi F, Khalili F . Diagnostic Accuracy of Rapid Antigen Tests for COVID-19 Detection: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:870738. PMC: 9021531. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.870738. View

5.
Silva C, Alegria J, Ramos C, Verdugo J, Diaz J, Varela C . RSNA-STR-ACR Consensus Statement for COVID-19 CT Patterns: Interreader Agreement in 240 Consecutive Patients and Association With RT-PCR Status. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2021; 45(3):485-489. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001162. View