» Articles » PMID: 37221653

A Cross-sectional Survey Examining Clinician Characteristics, Practices, and Attitudes Associated with Adoption of the 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Risk-based Management Consensus Guidelines

Overview
Journal Cancer
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 May 24
PMID 37221653
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) risk-based management consensus guidelines are the most recent national guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests. These guidelines benefit patients by concentrating testing and treatment in those at highest cervical cancer risk. Adoption of guidelines often occurs slowly, with few studies examining the factors associated with guideline-adherent management of abnormal results.

Methods: To elucidate the factors associated with the use of the 2019 ASCCP guidelines among clinicians who perform cervical cancer screening, physicians and advanced practice professionals who perform cervical cancer screening were cross-sectionally surveyed. Clinicians responded to screening vignettes with differing recommendations for management between the 2019 and prior management guidelines. Screening vignette 1 involved reduction of invasive testing on a low-risk patient; screening vignette 2 involved increased surveillance testing on a high-risk patient. Binomial logistic regression models determined the factors associated with the use of the 2019 guidelines.

Results: A total of 1251 clinicians participated from across the United States. For screening vignettes 1 and 2, guideline-adherent responses were given by 28% and 36% of participants, respectively. Management recommendations differed by specialty and were incorrect in different situations: there was inappropriate invasive testing by obstetrics and gynecology physicians (vignette 1) and inappropriate discontinuation of screening by family and internal medicine physicians (vignette 2). Regardless of their chosen response, over half erroneously believed they were guideline adherent.

Conclusions: Many clinicians who believe they are following appropriate guidelines may not realize their management strategy is inconsistent with the 2019 guidelines. Education initiatives tailored to clinician specialty could address the understanding of current guidelines, encourage the use of updated guidelines, maximize patient benefits, and minimize harms.

Plain Language Summary: The 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology risk-based management consensus guidelines are the most recent national guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening test management. We surveyed over 1200 obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN), family medicine, and internal medicine physicians and advanced practice providers about their screening and abnormal results follow-up practices in relation to guidelines. Few clinicians are following the 2019 guidelines. Management recommendations differed by clinician specialty and were incorrect in different situations: there was inappropriate invasive testing by OB/GYN physicians and inappropriate screening discontinuation by family and internal medicine physicians. Education tailored by clinician specialty could address the understanding of current guidelines, encourage the use of updated guidelines, maximize patient benefits, and minimize harms.

Citing Articles

Factors associated with willingness to perform expedited excisional treatment for patients at high risk for cervical precancer.

Perkins R, Fuzzell L, Brownstein N, Fontenot H, Michel A, Kajtezovic S Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2025; 57():101545.

PMID: 39811829 PMC: 11730952. DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101545.


Association Between Clinician Confidence and Making Guideline-Recommended Decisions in the Management of Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Results.

Dang T, Rieu-Werden M, Kobrin S, Tiro J, Werner C, Lykken J J Gen Intern Med. 2024; 39(16):3217-3224.

PMID: 39060782 PMC: 11618551. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08943-z.


PAX1 methylation as a robust predictor: developing and validating a nomogram for assessing endocervical curettage (ECC) necessity in human papillomavirus16/18-positive women undergoing colposcopy.

Lu Y, Wu H, Fu K, Shen Y, Li L, Liao Z Clin Epigenetics. 2024; 16(1):77.

PMID: 38849868 PMC: 11157736. DOI: 10.1186/s13148-024-01691-1.


Assessing Management of Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Results and Concordance with Guideline Recommendations in Three US Healthcare Settings.

Cheng D, Rieu-Werden M, Lykken J, Werner C, Feldman S, Silver M Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024; 33(7):912-922.

PMID: 38652505 PMC: 11366420. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-1564.


Survival disparities in non-Hispanic Black and White cervical cancer patients vary by histology and are largely explained by modifiable factors.

Kucera C, Chappell N, Tian C, Richardson M, Tarney C, Hamilton C Gynecol Oncol. 2024; 184:224-235.

PMID: 38340648 PMC: 11361276. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.02.005.