» Articles » PMID: 37221450

Eye and Airway Symptoms in Hospital Staff Exposed to a Product Containing Hydrogen Peroxide, Peracetic Acid, and Acetic Acid

Overview
Journal Am J Ind Med
Date 2023 May 23
PMID 37221450
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Sporicidal products containing hydrogen peroxide (HP), peracetic acid (PAA), and acetic acid (AA) are used widely in multiple industries, including healthcare. Despite widespread use in healthcare, few studies have assessed associations between exposures to HP, PAA, and AA, and work-related symptoms in these settings.

Methods: In 2018, we performed a health and exposure assessment at a hospital where a sporicidal product consisting of HP, PAA, and AA, was used as the primary cleaner on hospital surfaces. We collected 56 personal and mobile air samples for HP, PAA, and AA on participants while they performed their regular cleaning duties; collected area samples for HP (n = 28), PAA (n = 28), and AA (n = 70) in multiple hospital locations where cleaning was performed; and administered a postshift survey to assess eye, skin, and upper and lower airway symptoms that occurred cross-shift or in the previous 4 weeks.

Results: Full-shift exposure levels for HP (range: <3-559 ppb), PAA (range: <0.2-8 ppb), and AA (range: <5-915 ppb) were all below US occupational exposure limits. We observed positive associations (p < 0.05) between shift, departmental average, and departmental 95th percentile exposures to HP, PAA, and AA vapors, and work-related acute (cross-shift) and chronic (previous 4 weeks) eye, upper airway, and lower airway symptoms after adjusting for age, gender, smoking status, use of other cleaning products containing sensitizers and irritants, allergic status, and stress.

Conclusions: Our observations of work-related upper and lower airway symptoms among hospital workers exposed to vapors from a sporicidal product containing HP, PAA, and AA indicate a need for a combination of engineering, administrative, and PPE controls to reduce exposure. Additionally, alternative nonchemical disinfection technologies should be further investigated as a means to simultaneously reduce healthcare workers' exposure to disinfectants while also minimizing costly healthcare-acquired infections.

Citing Articles

WITHDRAWN: Filovirus outbreak responses and occupational health effects of chlorine spraying in healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of alternative disinfectants and application methods.

Fontana L, Stabile L, Caracci E, Chaillon A, Ait-Ikhlef K, Buonanno G medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39371180 PMC: 11451664. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.18.24313940.

References
1.
Dumas O, Varraso R, Boggs K, Quinot C, Zock J, Henneberger P . Association of Occupational Exposure to Disinfectants With Incidence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Among US Female Nurses. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2(10):e1913563. PMC: 6813668. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13563. View

2.
Sahay S, Gera K, Bhargava S, Shah A . Occurrence and impact of sinusitis in patients with asthma and/or allergic rhinitis. J Asthma. 2016; 53(6):635-43. DOI: 10.3109/02770903.2015.1091005. View

3.
Vizcaya D, Mirabelli M, Anto J, Orriols R, Burgos F, Arjona L . A workforce-based study of occupational exposures and asthma symptoms in cleaning workers. Occup Environ Med. 2011; 68(12):914-9. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2010.063271. View

4.
Elo A, Leppanen A, Jahkola A . Validity of a single-item measure of stress symptoms. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2004; 29(6):444-51. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.752. View

5.
Charles L, Loomis D, Demissie Z . Occupational hazards experienced by cleaning workers and janitors: A review of the epidemiologic literature. Work. 2009; 34(1):105-16. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2009-0907. View