» Articles » PMID: 37220898

Real-world Implementation of Non-endoscopic Triage Testing for Barrett's Oesophagus During COVID-19

Overview
Journal QJM
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 May 23
PMID 37220898
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) curtailed endoscopy services, adding to diagnostic backlogs. Building on trial evidence for a non-endoscopic oesophageal cell collection device coupled with biomarkers (Cytosponge), an implementation pilot was launched for patients on waiting lists for reflux and Barrett's oesophagus surveillance.

Aims: (i) To review reflux referral patterns and Barrett's surveillance practices. (ii) To evaluate the range of Cytosponge findings and impact on endoscopy services.

Design And Methods: Cytosponge data from centralized laboratory processing (trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) for intestinal metaplasia (IM), haematoxylin & eosin for cellular atypia and p53 for dysplasia) over a 2-year period were included.

Results: A total of 10 577 procedures were performed in 61 hospitals in England and Scotland, of which 92.5% (N = 9784/10 577) were sufficient for analysis. In the reflux cohort (N = 4074 with gastro-oesophageal junction sampling), 14.7% had one or more positive biomarkers (TFF3: 13.6% (N = 550/4056), p53: 0.5% (21/3974), atypia: 1.5% (N = 63/4071)), requiring endoscopy. Among samples from individuals undergoing Barrett's surveillance (N = 5710 with sufficient gland groups), TFF3-positivity increased with segment length (odds ratio = 1.37 per cm (95% confidence interval: 1.33-1.41, P < 0.001)). Some surveillance referrals (21.5%, N = 1175/5471) had ≤1 cm segment length, of which 65.9% (707/1073) were TFF3 negative. Of all surveillance procedures, 8.3% had dysplastic biomarkers (4.0% (N = 225/5630) for p53 and 7.6% (N = 430/5694) for atypia), increasing to 11.8% (N = 420/3552) in TFF3+ cases with confirmed IM and 19.7% (N = 58/294) in ultra-long segments.

Conclusions: Cytosponge-biomarker tests enabled targeting of endoscopy services to higher-risk individuals, whereas those with TFF3 negative ultra-short segments could be reconsidered regarding their Barrett's oesophagus status and surveillance requirements. Long-term follow-up will be important in these cohorts.

Citing Articles

Use of a Non-Endoscopic Capsule-Sponge Triage Test for Reflux Symptoms: Results From the NHS England Prospective Real-World Evaluation.

Gourgiotis V, Graham C, Foerster K, Fitzgerald R, Harvey R, Morris D Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2025; 61(5):876-885.

PMID: 39794909 PMC: 11825927. DOI: 10.1111/apt.18472.


Clinical application of capsule sponge testing in symptomatic reflux disease: a national prospective cohort study.

Chien S, Glen P, Bryce G, Cruickshank N, Penman I, Robertson K BMC Gastroenterol. 2024; 24(1):431.

PMID: 39592951 PMC: 11590222. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03503-5.


Oesophageal cell collection device and biomarker testing to identify high-risk Barrett's patients requiring endoscopic investigation.

Chien S, Glen P, Penman I, Cruickshank N, Bryce G, Crumley A Br J Surg. 2024; 111(5).

PMID: 38736137 PMC: 11089076. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae117.


Enabling large-scale screening of Barrett's esophagus using weakly supervised deep learning in histopathology.

Bouzid K, Sharma H, Killcoyne S, Castro D, Schwaighofer A, Ilse M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):2026.

PMID: 38467600 PMC: 10928093. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46174-2.


Latest Advances in Endoscopic Detection of Oesophageal and Gastric Neoplasia.

Waddingham W, Graham D, Banks M Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(3.

PMID: 38337817 PMC: 10855581. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14030301.

References
1.
Peters Y, Honing J, Kievit W, Kestens C, Pestman W, Nagtegaal I . Incidence of Progression of Persistent Nondysplastic Barrett's Esophagus to Malignancy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 17(5):869-877.e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.08.033. View

2.
El-Serag H, Naik A, Duan Z, Shakhatreh M, Helm A, Pathak A . Surveillance endoscopy is associated with improved outcomes of oesophageal adenocarcinoma detected in patients with Barrett's oesophagus. Gut. 2015; 65(8):1252-60. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308865. View

3.
Fitzgerald R, Antoniou A, Fruk L, Rosenfeld N . The future of early cancer detection. Nat Med. 2022; 28(4):666-677. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-01746-x. View

4.
Smyth E, Lagergren J, Fitzgerald R, Lordick F, Shah M, Lagergren P . Oesophageal cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017; 3:17048. PMC: 6168059. DOI: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.48. View

5.
Vennalaganti P, Kanakadandi V, Goldblum J, Mathur S, Patil D, Offerhaus G . Discordance Among Pathologists in the United States and Europe in Diagnosis of Low-Grade Dysplasia for Patients With Barrett's Esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2016; 152(3):564-570.e4. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.10.041. View