Interhemispheric Neural Characteristics of Noxious Mechano-nociceptive Stimulation in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex

Overview

Journal Front Neural Circuits

Date 2023 May 22

PMID 37215504

Authors

Amir Aminitabar

Mahnoosh Mirmoosavi

Mohammad Taghi Ghodrati

Vahid Shalchyan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience. One of the most critical regions of the brain for pain processing is the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Several studies have examined the role of this region in thermal nociceptive pain. However, studies on mechanical nociceptive pain have been very limited to date. Although several studies have investigated pain, the interactions between the two hemispheres are still not clear. This study aimed to investigate nociceptive mechanical pain in the ACC bilaterally.

Methods: Local field potential (LFP) signals were recorded from seven male Wistar rats' ACC regions of both hemispheres. Mechanical stimulations with two intensities, high-intensity noxious (HN) and non-noxious (NN) were applied to the left hind paw. At the same time, the LFP signals were recorded bilaterally from awake and freely moving rats. The recorded signals were analyzed from different perspectives, including spectral analysis, intensity classification, evoked potential (EP) analysis, and synchrony and similarity of two hemispheres.

Results: By using spectro-temporal features and support vector machine (SVM) classifier, HN vs. no-stimulation (NS), NN vs. NS, and HN vs. NN were classified with accuracies of 89.6, 71.1, and 84.7%, respectively. Analyses of the signals from the two hemispheres showed that the EPs in the two hemispheres were very similar and occurred simultaneously; however, the correlation and phase locking value (PLV) between the two hemispheres changed significantly after HN stimulation. These variations persisted for up to 4 s after the stimulation. In contrast, variations in the PLV and correlation for NN stimulation were not significant.

Conclusions: This study showed that the ACC area was able to distinguish the intensity of mechanical stimulation based on the power activities of neural responses. In addition, our results suggest that the ACC region is activated bilaterally due to nociceptive mechanical pain. Additionally, stimulations above the pain threshold (HN) significantly affect the synchronicity and correlation between the two hemispheres compared to non-noxious stimuli.

Citing Articles

Long-range inhibition from prelimbic to cingulate areas of the medial prefrontal cortex enhances network activity and response execution.

Utashiro N, MacLaren D, Liu Y, Yaqubi K, Wojak B, Monyer H Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):5772.

PMID: 38982042 PMC: 11233578. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50055-z.

References

Coghill R, Sang C, Maisog J, Iadarola M . Pain intensity processing within the human brain: a bilateral, distributed mechanism. J Neurophysiol. 1999; 82(4):1934-43. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1999.82.4.1934. View

Xiao Z, Martinez E, Kulkarni P, Zhang Q, Hou Q, Rosenberg D . Cortical Pain Processing in the Rat Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Primary Somatosensory Cortex. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019; 13:165. PMC: 6492531. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00165. View

Yamamura H, Iwata K, Tsuboi Y, Toda K, Kitajima K, Shimizu N . Morphological and electrophysiological properties of ACCx nociceptive neurons in rats. Brain Res. 1996; 735(1):83-92. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(96)00561-6. View

Johansen J, Fields H . Glutamatergic activation of anterior cingulate cortex produces an aversive teaching signal. Nat Neurosci. 2004; 7(4):398-403. DOI: 10.1038/nn1207. View

Zhou H, Zhang Q, Martinez E, Dale J, Hu S, Zhang E . Ketamine reduces aversion in rodent pain models by suppressing hyperactivity of the anterior cingulate cortex. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1):3751. PMC: 6138720. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06295-x. View

Peng W, Xia X, Yi M, Huang G, Zhang Z, Iannetti G . Brain oscillations reflecting pain-related behavior in freely moving rats. Pain. 2017; 159(1):106-118. PMC: 5737457. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001069. View

Basbaum A, Bautista D, Scherrer G, Julius D . Cellular and molecular mechanisms of pain. Cell. 2009; 139(2):267-84. PMC: 2852643. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.09.028. View

Wang J, Luo F, Chang J, Woodward D, Han J . Parallel pain processing in freely moving rats revealed by distributed neuron recording. Brain Res. 2003; 992(2):263-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2003.08.059. View

Zhang Y, Pan X, Wang R, Sakagami M . Functional connectivity between prefrontal cortex and striatum estimated by phase locking value. Cogn Neurodyn. 2016; 10(3):245-54. PMC: 4870408. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-016-9376-2. View

10.

Urien L, Xiao Z, Dale J, Bauer E, Chen Z, Wang J . Rate and Temporal Coding Mechanisms in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex for Pain Anticipation. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):8298. PMC: 5974274. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26518-x. View

11.

Navratilova E, Xie J, Okun A, Qu C, Eyde N, Ci S . Pain relief produces negative reinforcement through activation of mesolimbic reward-valuation circuitry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(50):20709-13. PMC: 3528534. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1214605109. View

12.

Vogt B, Sikes R . The medial pain system, cingulate cortex, and parallel processing of nociceptive information. Prog Brain Res. 2000; 122:223-35. DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)62141-x. View

13.

Johansen J, Fields H, Manning B . The affective component of pain in rodents: direct evidence for a contribution of the anterior cingulate cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(14):8077-82. PMC: 35470. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.141218998. View

14.

Garcia-Larrea L, Convers P, Magnin M, Andre-Obadia N, Peyron R, Laurent B . Laser-evoked potential abnormalities in central pain patients: the influence of spontaneous and provoked pain. Brain. 2002; 125(Pt 12):2766-81. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awf275. View

15.

Mandrekar J . Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol. 2010; 5(9):1315-6. DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181ec173d. View

16.

Iannetti G, Hughes N, Lee M, Mouraux A . Determinants of laser-evoked EEG responses: pain perception or stimulus saliency?. J Neurophysiol. 2008; 100(2):815-28. PMC: 2525705. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00097.2008. View

17.

Woolf C . What is this thing called pain?. J Clin Invest. 2010; 120(11):3742-4. PMC: 2965006. DOI: 10.1172/JCI45178. View

18.

Lin Y, Cui S, Du J, Li G, He Y, Zhang P . N1 and P1 Components Associate With Visuospatial-Executive and Language Functions in Normosmic Parkinson's Disease: An Event-Related Potential Study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019; 11:18. PMC: 6370661. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00018. View

19.

Wang J, Zhang H, Chang J, Woodward D, Baccala L, Luo F . Anticipation of pain enhances the nociceptive transmission and functional connectivity within pain network in rats. Mol Pain. 2008; 4:34. PMC: 2531182. DOI: 10.1186/1744-8069-4-34. View

20.

de Sousa M, Ferraresi C, de Magalhaes A, Yoshimura E, Hamblin M . Building, testing and validating a set of home-made von Frey filaments: a precise, accurate and cost effective alternative for nociception assessment. J Neurosci Methods. 2014; 232:1-5. PMC: 4136637. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.04.017. View