» Articles » PMID: 37214523

Mixed-method Evaluation of Fidelity of Motivational Interviewing-based Coaching in Program for Caregivers of Children with Autism

Overview
Journal PEC Innov
Specialty Health Services
Date 2023 May 22
PMID 37214523
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This mixed method analysis examined fidelity of the motivational interviewing (MI) delivered during the wellness program for caregivers of children with Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Methods: Coaches used a manualized MI-approach to collaboratively design participants' individualized wellness programs, and then used it in monthly coaching sessions to support goal pursuit. Audio-recorded consultations and post-participation focus groups were transcribed verbatim. Consultation transcripts were rated for MI adherence using Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity Code. Focus group data was coded by the team to identify conceptual categories.

Results: Eighty-seven percent of consultations achieved a beginning (competent) level expert-derived MI standard. Caregivers noted that coaches' MI approach evoked deep emotions and understandings about their lives related to wellness goals, allowed for a permissive flexibility in goal pursuit, and fostered supportive accountability.

Conclusion: MI was used with high levels of fidelity. Participants described the MI approach as more productive, precise, and useful in addressing their needs compared to other available interventions.

Citing Articles

Assessment of Acceptability, Usage, and Impact on Caregivers of Children With Autism's Stress and Mindfulness: Multiple-Method Feasibility Study of the 5Minutes4Myself App's Mindfulness Module.

Larson E, Mattie R, Riffkin S JMIR Hum Factors. 2024; 11:e54171.

PMID: 39480802 PMC: 11542669. DOI: 10.2196/54171.

References
1.
Jelsma J, Mertens V, Forsberg L, Forsberg L . How to Measure Motivational Interviewing Fidelity in Randomized Controlled Trials: Practical Recommendations. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015; 43:93-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.05.001. View

2.
Sepulveda A, Wise C, Zabala M, Todd G, Treasure J . Development and reliability of a Motivational Interviewing Scenarios Tool for Eating Disorders (MIST-ED) using a skills-based intervention among caregivers. Eat Behav. 2013; 14(4):432-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.07.010. View

3.
Gallagher S, Whiteley J . The association between stress and physical health in parents caring for children with intellectual disabilities is moderated by children's challenging behaviours. J Health Psychol. 2012; 18(9):1220-31. DOI: 10.1177/1359105312464672. View

4.
Hallgren K, Dembe A, Pace B, Imel Z, Lee C, Atkins D . Variability in motivational interviewing adherence across sessions, providers, sites, and research contexts. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017; 84:30-41. PMC: 5718367. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.10.011. View

5.
Leske A, Mustchin C, Bhujel N, Rajan S, Satur J . Fidelity of motivational interviewing with families in high-caries-risk children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2020; 49(5):410-419. DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12614. View