» Articles » PMID: 37211282

Prospective Evaluation of in Vivo and Phantom Repeatability and Reproducibility of Diffusion-weighted MRI Sequences on 1.5 T MRI-linear Accelerator (MR-Linac) and MR Simulator Devices for Head and Neck Cancers

Abstract

Introduction: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) on MRI-linear accelerator (MR-linac) systems can potentially be used for monitoring treatment response and adaptive radiotherapy in head and neck cancers (HNC) but requires extensive validation. We performed technical validation to compare six total DWI sequences on an MR-linac and MR simulator (MR sim) in patients, volunteers, and phantoms.

Methods: Ten human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer patients and ten healthy volunteers underwent DWI on a 1.5 T MR-linac with three DWI sequences: echo planar imaging (EPI), split acquisition of fast spin echo signals (SPLICE), and turbo spin echo (TSE). Volunteers were also imaged on a 1.5 T MR sim with three sequences: EPI, BLADE (vendor tradename), and readout segmentation of long variable echo trains (RESOLVE). Participants underwent two scan sessions per device and two repeats of each sequence per session. Repeatability and reproducibility within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV) of mean ADC were calculated for tumors and lymph nodes (patients) and parotid glands (volunteers). ADC bias, repeatability/reproducibility metrics, SNR, and geometric distortion were quantified using a phantom.

Results: In vivo repeatability/reproducibility wCV for parotids were 5.41%/6.72%, 3.83%/8.80%, 5.66%/10.03%, 3.44%/5.70%, 5.04%/5.66%, 4.23%/7.36% for EPI, SPLICE, TSE, EPI, BLADE, RESOLVE. Repeatability/reproducibility wCV for EPI, SPLICE, TSE were 9.64%/10.28%, 7.84%/8.96%, 7.60%/11.68% for tumors and 7.80%/9.95%, 7.23%/8.48%, 10.82%/10.44% for nodes. All sequences except TSE had phantom ADC biases within ± 0.1x10 mm/s for most vials (EPI, SPLICE, and BLADE had 2, 3, and 1 vials out of 13 with larger biases, respectively). SNR of b = 0 images was 87.3, 180.5, 161.3, 171.0, 171.9, 130.2 for EPI, SPLICE, TSE, EPI, BLADE, RESOLVE.

Conclusion: MR-linac DWI sequences demonstrated near-comparable performance to MR sim sequences and warrant further clinical validation for treatment response assessment in HNC.

Citing Articles

Longitudinal assessment of diffusion-weighted imaging during magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.

Boeke S, Habrich J, Kubler S, Boldt J, Schick F, Nikolaou K Radiat Oncol. 2025; 20(1):15.

PMID: 39881423 PMC: 11780986. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02589-9.


Conference Report: Review of Clinical Implementation of Advanced Quantitative Imaging Techniques for Personalized Radiotherapy.

Vinogradskiy Y, Bahig H, Bucknell N, Buchsbaum J, Shu H Tomography. 2024; 10(11):1798-1813.

PMID: 39590941 PMC: 11598114. DOI: 10.3390/tomography10110132.


Reduced-distortion diffusion weighted imaging for head and neck radiotherapy.

Aliotta E, Paudyal R, Dresner A, Shukla-Dave A, Lee N, Cervino L Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024; 32:100653.

PMID: 39399877 PMC: 11466654. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100653.


The QIBA Profile for Diffusion-Weighted MRI: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker.

Boss M, Malyarenko D, Partridge S, Obuchowski N, Shukla-Dave A, Winfield J Radiology. 2024; 313(1):e233055.

PMID: 39377680 PMC: 11537247. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.233055.


Preclinical monitoring of radiation-induced brain injury via GluCEST MRI and resting-state fMRI at 7 T: an exploratory study on MRI-guided OAR avoidance.

Li G, Li H, Weng N, Liu C, Li X, Li Q Strahlenther Onkol. 2024; .

PMID: 39259349 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02292-w.


References
1.
Li Z, Pipe J, Lee C, Debbins J, Karis J, Huo D . X-PROP: a fast and robust diffusion-weighted propeller technique. Magn Reson Med. 2011; 66(2):341-7. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.23033. View

2.
van Houdt P, Yang Y, van der Heide U . Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Biological Image-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy. Front Oncol. 2021; 10:615643. PMC: 7878523. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.615643. View

3.
Connolly M, Srinivasan A . Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Head and Neck Cancer: Technique, Limitations, and Applications. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2017; 26(1):121-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2017.08.011. View

4.
Chang Z, Wang C . Treatment assessment of radiotherapy using MR functional quantitative imaging. World J Radiol. 2015; 7(1):1-6. PMC: 4295173. DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i1.1. View

5.
Vandecaveye V, Dirix P, De Keyzer F, Op de Beeck K, Vander Poorten V, Hauben E . Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging early after chemoradiotherapy to monitor treatment response in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 82(3):1098-107. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.02.044. View