» Articles » PMID: 37209757

Quantifying MR Head Motion in the Rhineland Study - A Robust Method for Population Cohorts

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2023 May 20
PMID 37209757
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Head motion during MR acquisition reduces image quality and has been shown to bias neuromorphometric analysis. The quantification of head motion, therefore, has both neuroscientific as well as clinical applications, for example, to control for motion in statistical analyses of brain morphology, or as a variable of interest in neurological studies. The accuracy of markerless optical head tracking, however, is largely unexplored. Furthermore, no quantitative analysis of head motion in a general, mostly healthy population cohort exists thus far. In this work, we present a robust registration method for the alignment of depth camera data that sensitively estimates even small head movements of compliant participants. Our method outperforms the vendor-supplied method in three validation experiments: 1. similarity to fMRI motion traces as a low-frequency reference, 2. recovery of the independently acquired breathing signal as a high-frequency reference, and 3. correlation with image-based quality metrics in structural T1-weighted MRI. In addition to the core algorithm, we establish an analysis pipeline that computes average motion scores per time interval or per sequence for inclusion in downstream analyses. We apply the pipeline in the Rhineland Study, a large population cohort study, where we replicate age and body mass index (BMI) as motion correlates and show that head motion significantly increases over the duration of the scan session. We observe weak, yet significant interactions between this within-session increase and age, BMI, and sex. High correlations between fMRI and camera-based motion scores of proceeding sequences further suggest that fMRI motion estimates can be used as a surrogate score in the absence of better measures to control for motion in statistical analyses.

Citing Articles

Assessment of Subject Head Motion in Diffusion MRI.

Topolnjak E, Gao C, Beason-Held L, Resnick S, Schilling K, Landman B Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2024; 12926.

PMID: 39220213 PMC: 11364405. DOI: 10.1117/12.3006633.


Precision Brain Morphometry Using Cluster Scanning.

Elliott M, Nielsen J, Hanford L, Hamadeh A, Hilbert T, Kober T medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38234845 PMC: 10793507. DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.23.23300492.

References
1.
Cox A, Virues-Ortega J, Julio F, Martin T . Establishing motion control in children with autism and intellectual disability: Applications for anatomical and functional MRI. J Appl Behav Anal. 2016; 50(1):8-26. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.351. View

2.
Frost R, Wighton P, Karahanoglu F, Robertson R, Grant P, Fischl B . Markerless high-frequency prospective motion correction for neuroanatomical MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2019; 82(1):126-144. PMC: 6491242. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27705. View

3.
Frew S, Samara A, Shearer H, Eilbott J, Vanderwal T . Getting the nod: Pediatric head motion in a transdiagnostic sample during movie- and resting-state fMRI. PLoS One. 2022; 17(4):e0265112. PMC: 9009630. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265112. View

4.
Einspanner E, Jochimsen T, Harries J, Melzer A, Unger M, Brown R . Evaluating different methods of MR-based motion correction in simultaneous PET/MR using a head phantom moved by a robotic system. EJNMMI Phys. 2022; 9(1):15. PMC: 8894542. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-022-00442-6. View

5.
Mugler 3rd J . Optimized three-dimensional fast-spin-echo MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014; 39(4):745-67. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24542. View