» Articles » PMID: 37209221

Proteomic Analysis to Unravel the Biochemical Mechanisms Triggered by Bacillus Toyonensis SFC 500-1E Under Chromium(VI) and Phenol Stress

Overview
Journal Biometals
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2023 May 20
PMID 37209221
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bacillus toyonensis SFC 500-1E is a member of the consortium SFC 500-1 able to remove Cr(VI) and simultaneously tolerate high phenol concentrations. In order to elucidate mechanisms utilized by this strain during the bioremediation process, the differential expression pattern of proteins was analyzed when it grew with or without Cr(VI) (10 mg/L) and Cr(VI) + phenol (10 and 300 mg/L), through two complementary proteomic approaches: gel-based (Gel-LC) and gel-free (shotgun) nanoUHPLC-ESI-MS/MS. A total of 400 differentially expressed proteins were identified, out of which 152 proteins were down-regulated under Cr(VI) and 205 up-regulated in the presence of Cr(VI) + phenol, suggesting the extra effort made by the strain to adapt itself and keep growing when phenol was also added. The major metabolic pathways affected include carbohydrate and energetic metabolism, followed by lipid and amino acid metabolism. Particularly interesting were also ABC transporters and the iron-siderophore transporter as well as transcriptional regulators that can bind metals. Stress-associated global response involving the expression of thioredoxins, SOS response, and chaperones appears to be crucial for the survival of this strain under treatment with both contaminants. This research not only provided a deeper understanding of B. toyonensis SFC 500-1E metabolic role in Cr(VI) and phenol bioremediation process but also allowed us to complete an overview of the consortium SFC 500-1 behavior. This may contribute to an improvement in its use as a bioremediation strategy and also provides a baseline for further research.

Citing Articles

The Leptospira interrogans proteome's response to zinc highlights the potential involvement of this metal in translational-machinery and virulence.

Hecktheuer A, Santos C, Ferreira F, Barbosa A, Isaac L, Marques M Biometals. 2024; 37(6):1677-1698.

PMID: 39305434 DOI: 10.1007/s10534-024-00634-w.

References
1.
Aebersold R, Mann M . Mass-spectrometric exploration of proteome structure and function. Nature. 2016; 537(7620):347-55. DOI: 10.1038/nature19949. View

2.
Ahemad M . Bacterial mechanisms for Cr(VI) resistance and reduction: an overview and recent advances. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2014; 59(4):321-32. DOI: 10.1007/s12223-014-0304-8. View

3.
Antelmann H, Hecker M, Zuber P . Proteomic signatures uncover thiol-specific electrophile resistance mechanisms in Bacillus subtilis. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2008; 5(1):77-90. DOI: 10.1586/14789450.5.1.77. View

4.
Bae W, Lee H, Choe Y, Jahng D, Lee S, Kim S . Purification and characterization of NADPH-dependent Cr(VI) reductase from Escherichia coli ATCC 33456. J Microbiol. 2005; 43(1):21-7. View

5.
Baksh K, Zamble D . Allosteric control of metal-responsive transcriptional regulators in bacteria. J Biol Chem. 2019; 295(6):1673-1684. PMC: 7008368. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.REV119.011444. View