The Role of Dedicated Research Training in Promoting Academic Success in Plastic Surgery: Analysis of 949 Faculty Career Outcomes

Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of attending academic plastic surgeons in the United States was conducted. Outcomes were compared between faculty who completed research training (research fellowship, PhD, or MPH) and those who did not. Outcomes included promotion to full professor and/or department chair, h-index, and attainment of National Institutes of Health funding. Outcomes were analyzed using chi-squared tests, tests, and multivariable regressions.

Results: A total of 949 plastic surgery faculty members were included, and of those, 185 (19.5%) completed dedicated research training, including 13.7% (n = 130) who completed a research fellowship. Surgeons who completed dedicated research training were significantly more likely to achieve full professorship (31.4% versus 24.1%, = 0.01), obtain National Institutes of Health funding (18.4% versus 6.5%, < 0.001), and have a higher mean h-index (15.6 versus 11.6, < 0.001). Dedicated research fellowships were independently predictive of achieving full professorship (OR = 2.12, = 0.002), increased h-index (β = 4.86, < 0.001), and attainment of National Institutes of Health funding (OR = 5.06, = 0.01). Completion of dedicated research training did not predict an increased likelihood of becoming department chair.

Conclusion: The performance of dedicated research training was predictive of improved markers of career success in plastic surgery and should be considered beneficial in both the short and long term.