» Articles » PMID: 37206918

Workplace Supported Recovery from Substance Use Disorders: Defining the Construct, Developing a Model, and Proposing an Agenda for Future Research

Overview
Date 2023 May 19
PMID 37206918
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Substance use disorders (SUDs) represent a critical public and occupational health issue. Therefore, understanding the process of SUD recovery has become an issue of growing importance among substance use and recovery professionals. Nonetheless, despite the acknowledged importance of employment for SUD recovery, little conceptual or empirical work exists on how the workplace might support or undermine SUD recovery. In this article, we address this limitation in several ways. First, to promote a better understanding of SUD recovery for occupational health researchers, we provide a brief overview of the nature of a SUD, prior definitions of SUD recovery, and general themes associated with the recovery process. Second, we develop a working definition of . Third, we present a heuristic conceptual model showing how the workplace might impact the SUD recovery process. Fourth, using this model and research from the substance use and occupational health literatures, we develop a series of general research propositions. These propositions highlight broad directions requiring more detailed conceptualization and empirical research to understand better how work conditions may support or undermine the process of employee SUD recovery. Our overarching goal is to motivate innovative conceptualization and research on workplace supported recovery from SUDs. Such research may inform the development and evaluation of workplace interventions and policies supporting SUD recovery and highlight the benefits of workplace supported SUD recovery for employees, employers, and communities. Research on this issue may allow occupational health researchers to impact a significant societal and occupational health issue.

Citing Articles

The wildland firefighter exposure and health effect (WFFEHE) study: cohort characteristics and health behavior changes in context.

Scott K, Wingate K, DuBose K, Butler C, Ramirez-Cardenas A, Hale C Ann Work Expo Health. 2024; 68(2):122-135.

PMID: 38164597 PMC: 10922597. DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxad080.

References
1.
Baldwin M, Marcus S, De Simone J . Job loss discrimination and former substance use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010; 110(1-2):1-7. PMC: 2885482. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.01.018. View

2.
White W . Addiction recovery: its definition and conceptual boundaries. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007; 33(3):229-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2007.04.015. View

3.
Sahker E, Ali S, Arndt S . Employment recovery capital in the treatment of substance use disorders: Six-month follow-up observations. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019; 205:107624. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107624. View

4.
Corrigan P, Nieweglowski K . Stigma and the public health agenda for the opioid crisis in America. Int J Drug Policy. 2018; 59:44-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.06.015. View

5.
Frone M . Relations of negative and positive work experiences to employee alcohol use: testing the intervening role of negative and positive work rumination. J Occup Health Psychol. 2014; 20(2):148-60. PMC: 4372465. DOI: 10.1037/a0038375. View