» Articles » PMID: 37206506

Assessing the Diagnostic Performance of CT in Suspected Urinary Stones: A Retrospective Analysis

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2023 May 19
PMID 37206506
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background Urinary stone disease is a common reason for emergency department (ED) visits, and a computed tomography scan of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder (CT-KUB) is frequently used for diagnosis. The objective of this study was to estimate the positive rate of CT-KUB and identify predictors of emergency interventions for patients with ureteric stones. Methods A retrospective study was conducted to investigate the positive rate of CT-KUB for urinary stone disease and to explore the factors that determine the need for emergency urologic interventions. The study population included adult patients who underwent CT-KUB to rule out urinary stones at King Fahd University Hospital. Results The study included 364 patients, of whom 245 (67.3%) were men and 119 (32.7%) were women. CT-KUB revealed stones in 243 (66.8%) patients, including 32.4% with renal stones and 54.4% with ureteric stones. Female patients were more likely to have normal results than male patients. Approximately 26.8% of patients with ureteric stones required emergency urologic intervention. Multivariable analysis found that the size and location of ureteric stones were independent predictors for emergency intervention. Patients with distal ureteric stones were 35% less likely to need emergency interventions than those with proximal stones. Conclusion The positive rate of CT-KUB was acceptable for patients with suspected urinary stone disease. Most demographic and clinical characteristics were not predictors for emergency interventions, but the size and location of ureteric stones and elevated creatinine levels were significantly associated.

References
1.
Costill D, Fink W . Plasma volume changes following exercise and thermal dehydration. J Appl Physiol. 1974; 37(4):521-5. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1974.37.4.521. View

2.
Jendeberg J, Geijer H, Alshamari M, Cierzniak B, Liden M . Size matters: The width and location of a ureteral stone accurately predict the chance of spontaneous passage. Eur Radiol. 2017; 27(11):4775-4785. PMC: 5635101. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4852-6. View

3.
Himelfarb J, Lakhani A, Shelton D . Appropriate use of CT for patients presenting with suspected renal colic: a quality improvement study. BMJ Open Qual. 2020; 8(4):e000470. PMC: 6937084. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000470. View

4.
Kirkali Z, Rasooly R, Star R, Rodgers G . Urinary Stone Disease: Progress, Status, and Needs. Urology. 2015; 86(4):651-3. PMC: 4592788. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.07.006. View

5.
Wright A, Rukin N, Somani B . Ureteroscopy and stones: Current status and future expectations. World J Nephrol. 2014; 3(4):243-8. PMC: 4220357. DOI: 10.5527/wjn.v3.i4.243. View