» Articles » PMID: 37204453

Association of C-peptide Level with Bone Mineral Density in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 2023 May 19
PMID 37204453
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To explore the relationship between C-peptide and BMD and fracture risk in T2DM patients.

Methods: 530 T2DM patients were enrolled and divided into three groups by FCP tertiles, and the clinical data were collected. BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) and hip fractures (HFs) was evaluated by adjusted fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX).

Results: In the FCP ≤ 1.14 ng/ml group, FCP level was positively correlated with WB, LS, and FN BMD, while FCP was negatively correlated with fracture risk and osteoporotic fracture history. However, FCP was not correlated with BMD and fracture risk and osteoporotic fracture history in the 1.14 < FCP ≤ 1.73 ng/ml and FCP > 1.73 ng/ml groups. The study has shown that FCP was an independent factor influencing BMD and fracture risk in the FCP ≤ 1.14 ng/ml group.

Conclusions: There is no significant linear relationship between FCP level and BMD or fracture risk in T2DM patients. In the FCP ≤ 1.14 ng/ml group, FCP is positively correlated with WB, LS, and FN BMD and negatively correlated with fracture risk, and FCP is an independent influencing factor of BMD and fracture risk. The findings suggest that FCP may predict the risk of osteoporosis or fracture in some T2DM patients, which has a certain clinical value.

Citing Articles

Association between systemic immune-inflammation index and trimethylamine N-oxide levels in peripheral blood and osteoporosis in overweight and obese patients.

Li L, An J, Bai J, Zhang Y, Li X, Lv H Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025; 16:1539594.

PMID: 40017693 PMC: 11864960. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1539594.


Metabolic factors are not the direct mediators of the association between type 2 diabetes and osteoporosis.

Yang Q, Wang X, Liu Y, Liu J, Zhu D Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1404747.

PMID: 39119008 PMC: 11306037. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1404747.

References
1.
Thomas C, Philipson L . Update on diabetes classification. Med Clin North Am. 2014; 99(1):1-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2014.08.015. View

2.
Petersen M, Shulman G . Mechanisms of Insulin Action and Insulin Resistance. Physiol Rev. 2018; 98(4):2133-2223. PMC: 6170977. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00063.2017. View

3.
Leighton E, Sainsbury C, Jones G . A Practical Review of C-Peptide Testing in Diabetes. Diabetes Ther. 2017; 8(3):475-487. PMC: 5446389. DOI: 10.1007/s13300-017-0265-4. View

4.
Jones A, Hattersley A . The clinical utility of C-peptide measurement in the care of patients with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2013; 30(7):803-17. PMC: 3748788. DOI: 10.1111/dme.12159. View

5.
Hoogwerf B, Bantle J, Gaenslen H, GREENBERG B, Senske B, Francis R . Infusion of synthetic human C-peptide does not affect plasma glucose, serum insulin, or plasma glucagon in healthy subjects. Metabolism. 1986; 35(2):122-5. DOI: 10.1016/0026-0495(86)90111-3. View