» Articles » PMID: 37203043

Higher-order Aberrations and Visual Quality After Incision Lenticule Extraction Surgery with Intraoperative Angle Kappa Adjustments Between Small and Large Kappa Patients: A 2-year Follow-up

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2023 May 19
PMID 37203043
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the postoperative visual outcomes, that is, corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and visual quality, of patients with an angle kappa greater than 0.30 mm who underwent angle kappa adjustment during small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) 2 years after surgery compared to eyes with an angle kappa less than 0.30 mm.

Methods: This was a retrospective study and included 12 patients from October 2019 to December 2019 who underwent the SMILE procedure for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism and had one eye with a large kappa angle and another eye with a small kappa angle. Twenty-four months after surgery, an optical quality analysis system (OQAS II; Visiometrics, Terrassa, Spain) was used to measure the modulation transfer function cutoff frequency (MTF), Strehl2D ratio, and objective scatter index (OSI). HOAs were measured with a Tracey iTrace Visual Function Analyzer (Tracey version 6.1.0; Tracey Technologies, Houston, TX, USA). Assessment of subjective visual quality was achieved using the quality of vision (QOV) questionnaire.

Results: At 24 months postoperatively, the mean spherical equivalent (SE) refraction was - 0.32 ± 0.40 and - 0.31 ± 0.35 in the S-kappa group (kappa <0.3 mm) and the L-kappa group (kappa ≥0.3 mm), respectively (P > 0.05). The mean OSI was 0.73 ± 0.32 and 0.81 ± 0.47, respectively (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in MTF and Strehl2D ratio between the two groups (P > 0.05). Total HOA, coma, spherical, trefoil, and secondary astigmatism were not significantly different (P > 0.05) between the two groups.

Conclusion: Adjustment of angle kappa during SMILE helps reduce the decentration, results in less HOAs, and promotes visual quality. It provides a reliable method to optimize the treatment concentration in SMILE.

Citing Articles

Comparison of objective visual quality between SMILE and FS-LASIK in moderate-to-high myopia.

Zou H, Wei X, Li L, Wei D, Mao H, Huang Y Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1408516.

PMID: 39359915 PMC: 11446171. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1408516.


Comparison of visual outcomes and optical aberrations after SMILE with intraoperative Kappa angle adjustments between small and large Kappa angles.

Lai X, Liu X, Zeng T, Huang Y, Yang X Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):14551.

PMID: 38914606 PMC: 11196622. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65366-w.

References
1.
Rabina G, Mimouni M, Slomovic J, Sorkin N, Nemet A, Kaiserman I . Centration of myopic refractive ablation: should we center treatment on the pupil or the visual axis?. Lasers Med Sci. 2021; 36(8):1733-1739. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-021-03358-2. View

2.
Chan C, Boxer Wachler B . Centration analysis of ablation over the coaxial corneal light reflex for hyperopic LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2006; 22(5):467-71. DOI: 10.3928/1081-597X-20060501-08. View

3.
Arba Mosquera S, Verma S, McAlinden C . Centration axis in refractive surgery. Eye Vis (Lond). 2015; 2:4. PMC: 4655455. DOI: 10.1186/s40662-015-0014-6. View

4.
Sekundo W, Kunert K, Blum M . Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 month prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010; 95(3):335-9. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2009.174284. View

5.
Diaz-Douton F, Benito A, Pujol J, Arjona M, Guell J, Artal P . Comparison of the retinal image quality with a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor and a double-pass instrument. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47(4):1710-6. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-1049. View