The Interaction of the Dorsolateral and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex During Mind Wandering

Overview

Journal Brain Topogr

Specialty Neurology

Date 2023 May 18

PMID 37202646

Authors

Vahid Nejati

Bahar Zamiran

Michael A Nitsche

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background And Aims: Mind wandering refers to spontaneously occurring, often disruptive thoughts during an ongoing task or resting state. The ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) are two main cortical areas which are involved in this process. This study aimed to explore the interaction of these areas during mind wandering by enhancing specific oscillatory activity of these areas via transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in the theta frequency range.

Material And Methods: Eighteen healthy adults participated in a randomized, single-blinded, crossover study. tACS (1.5 mA, 6 Hz) was applied in five sessions with one week interval via (1) two channels with synchronized stimulation over the left dlPFC and right vmPFC, (2) the same electrode placement with anti-phase stimulation, (3) stimulation over the left dlPFC only, (4) stimulation over right vmPFC only, and (5) sham stimulation. The return electrodes were placed over the contralateral shoulder in all conditions. The sustained attention to response task (SART) with embedded probes about task-unrelated-thoughts and awareness of these thoughts was performed during intervention.

Results: Stimulation did not alter SART performance. Right vmPFC stimulation decreased mind wandering and increased awareness of mind wandering. Left dlPFC stimulation and desynchronized stimulation over the dlPFC and vmPFC increased mind wandering compared to the sham stimulation condition. Synchronized stimulation had no effect on mind wandering, but increased awareness of mind wandering.

Conclusion: The results suggest that regional entrainment of the vmPFC decreases mind wandering and increases awareness of mind wandering, whereas regional entrainment of the dlPFC increases mind wandering, but decreases awareness. Under desynchronized stimulation of both areas, the propensity of mind wandering was increased, whereas synchronized stimulation increased the awareness of mind wandering. These results suggest a role of the dlPFC in initiation of mind wandering, whereas the vmPFC downregulates mind wandering, and might exert this function by counteracting respective dlPFC effects via theta oscillations.

References

Cheyne J, Solman G, Carriere J, Smilek D . Anatomy of an error: a bidirectional state model of task engagement/disengagement and attention-related errors. Cognition. 2009; 111(1):98-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.009. View

Andrews-Hanna J, Reidler J, Huang C, Buckner R . Evidence for the default network's role in spontaneous cognition. J Neurophysiol. 2010; 104(1):322-35. PMC: 2904225. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00830.2009. View

Andrews-Hanna J, Smallwood J, Nathan Spreng R . The default network and self-generated thought: component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014; 1316:29-52. PMC: 4039623. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12360. View

Antal A, Paulus W . Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7:317. PMC: 3695369. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00317. View

Axelrod V, Rees G, Lavidor M, Bar M . Increasing propensity to mind-wander with transcranial direct current stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(11):3314-9. PMC: 4371998. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1421435112. View

Axelrod V, Zhu X, Qiu J . Transcranial stimulation of the frontal lobes increases propensity of mind-wandering without changing meta-awareness. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):15975. PMC: 6206062. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34098-z. View

Baird B, Smallwood J, Mrazek M, Kam J, Franklin M, Schooler J . Inspired by distraction: mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychol Sci. 2012; 23(10):1117-22. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612446024. View

Banks J, Boals A . Understanding the role of mind wandering in stress-related working memory impairments. Cogn Emot. 2016; 31(5):1023-1030. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1179174. View

Banks J, Tartar J, Welhaf M . Where's the impairment: an examination of factors that impact sustained attention following a stressor. Cogn Emot. 2013; 28(5):856-66. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2013.857643. View

10.

Banks J, Welhaf M, Srour A . The protective effects of brief mindfulness meditation training. Conscious Cogn. 2015; 33:277-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.016. View

11.

Bertossi E, Aleo F, Braghittoni D, Ciaramelli E . Stuck in the here and now: Construction of fictitious and future experiences following ventromedial prefrontal damage. Neuropsychologia. 2015; 81:107-116. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.12.015. View

12.

Bertossi E, Tesini C, Cappelli A, Ciaramelli E . Ventromedial prefrontal damage causes a pervasive impairment of episodic memory and future thinking. Neuropsychologia. 2016; 90:12-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.034. View

13.

Bertossi E, Peccenini L, Solmi A, Avenanti A, Ciaramelli E . Transcranial direct current stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex dampens mind-wandering in men. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):16962. PMC: 5717259. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-17267-4. View

15.

Boayue N, Csifcsak G, Kreis I, Schmidt C, Finn I, Hovde Vollsund A . The interplay between executive control, behavioural variability and mind wandering: Insights from a high-definition transcranial direct-current stimulation study. Eur J Neurosci. 2020; 53(5):1498-1516. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15049. View

16.

Brunoni A, Amadera J, Berbel B, Volz M, Rizzerio B, Fregni F . A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011; 14(8):1133-45. DOI: 10.1017/S1461145710001690. View

17.

Buckner R, DiNicola L . The brain's default network: updated anatomy, physiology and evolving insights. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019; 20(10):593-608. DOI: 10.1038/s41583-019-0212-7. View

18.

Cavanagh J, Frank M . Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014; 18(8):414-21. PMC: 4112145. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.012. View

19.

Christoff K, Gordon A, Smallwood J, Smith R, Schooler J . Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(21):8719-24. PMC: 2689035. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0900234106. View

20.

Coulborn S, Bowman H, Miall R, Fernandez-Espejo D . Effect of tDCS Over the Right Inferior Parietal Lobule on Mind-Wandering Propensity. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020; 14:230. PMC: 7325883. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00230. View

21.

Filmer H, Griffin A, Dux P . For a minute there, I lost myself … dosage dependent increases in mind wandering via prefrontal tDCS. Neuropsychologia. 2019; 129:379-384. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.04.013. View