» Articles » PMID: 37202583

Cognitive Dissonance in the Self-assessed Health in Brazil: A CUB Model Analysis Using 2013 National Health Survey Data

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2023 May 18
PMID 37202583
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study ai ms to verify and analyze the existence of cognitive dissonance in the self-assessment of health by individuals in Brazil, that is, the difference between self-rated health and the health status of individuals. To accomplish this, we use data from the 2013 National Health Survey, which collected the self-assessments that individuals made of their health and information about their health status. This information was used to build indices that seek to represent a person's health status in relation to chronic illnesses, physical and mental well-being, eating habits and lifestyle. To identify the presence of cognitive dissonance, the CUB (Combination of a discrete Uniform and shifted Binomial distributions) model was used, which relates self-assessed health with the developed indices. Cognitive dissonance was identified in self-assessed health in relation to eating habits and lifestyle, and this dissonance may be associated with a present bias in the self-assessment of health in Brazil.

References
1.
Crossley T, Kennedy S . The reliability of self-assessed health status. J Health Econ. 2002; 21(4):643-58. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00007-3. View

2.
Doiron D, Jones G, Savage E . Healthy, wealthy and insured? The role of self-assessed health in the demand for private health insurance. Health Econ. 2007; 17(3):317-34. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1267. View

3.
Greenacre M . Correspondence analysis of the Spanish National Health Survey. Gac Sanit. 2002; 16(2):160-70. DOI: 10.1016/s0213-9111(02)71648-8. View

4.
Groot W . Adaptation and scale of reference bias in self-assessments of quality of life. J Health Econ. 2000; 19(3):403-20. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6296(99)00037-5. View

5.
Jurges H . True health vs response styles: exploring cross-country differences in self-reported health. Health Econ. 2006; 16(2):163-78. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1134. View