» Articles » PMID: 37201077

Diagnostic Value of Liver Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Date 2023 May 18
PMID 37201077
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma is the sixth most common cancer in the world, and its incidence rate will continue to increase. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is feasible as a rapid examination for early hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. However, considering the possible causes of false positives caused by ultrasound, its diagnostic value is still controversial. Therefore, the study conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the application value of CEUS in the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Methods: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid Technologies (OVID), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chongqing VIP Information (VIP), and Wanfang databases were searched to retrieve articles on the use of CEUS for the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. The literature quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) quality assessment tool. The meta-analysis was performed using STATA 17.0 to fit the bivariate mixed effects model, calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and corresponding 95% CI, summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC), area under the curve (AUC), and 95% confidence interval (CI). The publication bias of the included literature was evaluated using the DEEK funnel plot.

Results: Ultimately, 9 articles, comprising 1,434 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The heterogeneity test found that I>50%, using a random effects model. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the CEUS had a combined sensitivity of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86-0.95), a combined specificity of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.56-0.99), a combined PLR of 13.47 (95% CI: 1.51-120.46), a combined NLR of 0.09 (95% CI: 0.05-0.14), a combined DOR of 154.16 (95% CI: 15.93-1,492.02), a diagnostic score of 5.04 (95% CI: 2.77-7.31), and a combined AUC of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97). The correlation coefficient of the threshold-effect analysis was 0.13 (P>0.05). The results of the regression analysis showed that the country of publication (P=0.14) and the size of the lesion nodules (P=0.46) were not sources of heterogeneity.

Conclusions: Liver CEUS has an advantage in the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, with high sensitivity and specificity, and has clinical application value.

Citing Articles

Application value of different imaging methods in the early diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis.

Dong J, Wang Z, Wang S, Zhao H, Li J, Ma T Front Oncol. 2025; 14:1510296.

PMID: 39876892 PMC: 11772129. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1510296.


Ultrasonographic and clinicopathological features of pelvic yolk sac tumors in women: a single-center retrospective analysis.

Chen M, Zhang S, Jia X, Xu Y, Wei Y, Liao S Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1417761.

PMID: 38966065 PMC: 11222404. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1417761.


Evaluation of the Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Nonradiation Treatment Response Assessment LI-RADS v2024 Using Data From a Multi-Center Transarterial Chemoembolization Study.

Kuon Yeng Escalante C, Siu Xiao T, Nagaraj R, Savsani E, Mohammed A, Li J Acad Radiol. 2024; 31(12):5078-5086.

PMID: 38908918 PMC: 11606786. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.06.005.


The Clinical Value of Multimodal Ultrasound for the Differential Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Other Liver Tumors in Relation to Histopathology.

Urhut M, Sandulescu L, Ciocalteu A, Cazacu S, Danoiu S Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(20).

PMID: 37892109 PMC: 10606610. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13203288.

References
1.
Ye T, Shao S, Ji K, Yao S . Evaluation of short-term effects of drug-loaded microspheres and traditional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in the treatment of advanced liver cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022; 14(12):2367-2379. PMC: 9782616. DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i12.2367. View

2.
Dai L, Feng X, Chen Y, Wen W, Xu Y . [Imaging diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma using ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and multislice spiral CT]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2008; 28(8):1469-71. View

3.
Philipp Beyer L, Pregler B, Wiesinger I, Stroszczynski C, Wiggermann P, Jung E . Continuous dynamic registration of microvascularization of liver tumors with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Radiol Res Pract. 2014; 2014:347416. PMC: 4060158. DOI: 10.1155/2014/347416. View

4.
Garcia-Carbonero R, Jimenez-Fonseca P, Teule A, Barriuso J, Sevilla I . SEOM clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) 2014. Clin Transl Oncol. 2014; 16(12):1025-34. PMC: 4239790. DOI: 10.1007/s12094-014-1214-6. View

5.
Palmieri V, Santovito D, Marano G, Minerva F, Ricci L, DAlitto F . Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiol Med. 2015; 120(7):627-33. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-014-0494-9. View