A Retrospective Review of Real-world Outcomes Following 60-day Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Real-world data can provide important insights into treatment effectiveness in routine clinical practice. Studies have demonstrated that in multiple different pain indications temporary (60-day) percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) treatment can produce significant relief, but few real-world studies have been published. The present study is the first real-world, retrospective review of a large database depicting outcomes at the end of a 60-day PNS treatment period.
Objectives: Evaluate outcomes during a 60-day PNS treatment in routine clinical practice.
Study Design: Secondary retrospective review.
Methods: Anonymized records of 6,160 patients who were implanted with a SPRINT PNS System from August 2019 through August 2022 were retrospectively reviewed from a national real-world database. The percentage of patients with ? 50% pain relief and/or improvement in quality of life was evaluated and stratified by nerve target. Additional outcomes included average and worst pain score, patient-reported percentage of pain relief, and patient global impression of change.
Results: Overall, 71% of patients (4,348/6,160) were responders with >= 50% pain relief and/or improvement in quality of life; pain relief among responders averaged 63%. The responder rate was largely consistent across nerve targets throughout the back and trunk, upper and lower extremities, and posterior head and neck.
Limitations: This study was limited by its retrospective nature and reliance on a device manufacturer's database. Additionally, detailed demographic information and measures for pain medication usage and physical function were not assessed.
Conclusions: This retrospective analysis supports recent prospective studies demonstrating that 60-day percutaneous PNS can provide significant relief across a wide range of nerve targets. These data serve an important role in complementing the findings of published prospective clinical trials.
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Chronic Neuropathic Pain: A Health Technology Assessment.
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2025; 24(10):1-131.
PMID: 39886278 PMC: 11778797.
Real-world long-term outcomes of peripheral nerve stimulation: a prospective observational study.
Luna D, Hettie G, Pirrotta L, Salmasi V, Hah J Pain Manag. 2025; 15(1):37-44.
PMID: 39834252 PMC: 11801347. DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2451605.
Dickerson D, Kalia H, Vorenkamp K, Slavin K, Hagedorn J, Gunnarsson C Pain Ther. 2024; 14(1):269-282.
PMID: 39589685 PMC: 11751244. DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00677-4.
Briggi D, Reeh C, Yan G, Vangeison C, Husu E Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e71850.
PMID: 39559626 PMC: 11571276. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71850.
Gutierrez G, Mehta P, Mouch T, Puri S, Caylor J, Huffman W Interv Pain Med. 2024; 3(3):100419.
PMID: 39502900 PMC: 11536284. DOI: 10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100419.