» Articles » PMID: 37191182

Infection After Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fracture - Does Antibiotic-loaded Bone Cement Reduce Infection Risk After Hemiarthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Overview
Journal Bone Joint Res
Date 2023 May 16
PMID 37191182
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: The aim of this investigation was to compare risk of infection in both cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty (HA) as well as in total hip arthroplasty (THA) following femoral neck fracture.

Methods: Data collection was performed using the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD). In HA and THA following femoral neck fracture, fixation method was divided into cemented and uncemented prostheses and paired according to age, sex, BMI, and the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index using Mahalanobis distance matching.

Results: Overall in 13,612 cases of intracapsular femoral neck fracture, 9,110 (66.9%) HAs and 4,502 (33.1%) THAs were analyzed. Infection rate in HA was significantly reduced in cases with use of antibiotic-loaded cement compared with uncemented fixated prosthesis (p = 0.013). In patients with THA no statistical difference between cemented and uncemented prosthesis was registered, however after one year 2.4% of infections were detected in uncemented and 2.1% in cemented THA. In the subpopulation of HA after one year, 1.9% of infections were registered in cemented and 2.8% in uncemented HA. BMI (p = 0.001) and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (p < 0.003) were identified as risk factors of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), while in THA cemented prosthesis also demonstrated an increased risk within the first 30 days (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.73; p = 0.010).

Conclusion: The rate of infection after intracapsular femoral neck fracture was statistically significantly reduced in patients treated by antibiotic-loaded cemented HA. Particularly for patients with multiple risk factors for the development of a PJI, the usage of antibiotic-loaded bone cement seems to be a reasonable procedure for prevention of infection.

Citing Articles

Long-term outcomes of cemented compared to uncemented femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients.

Axenhus M, Chammout G, Kelly-Pettersson P, Mukka S, Magneli M, Skoldenberg O Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025; 51(1):73.

PMID: 39982453 PMC: 11845541. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02735-0.


Risk factors for one-year mortality in 440 femoral peri-implant fractures: insights from the PIPPAS prospective, multicentre, observational study.

Aguado H, Castillon-Bernal P, Teixidor-Serra J, Garcia-Sanchez Y, Munoz-Vives J, Camacho-Carrasco P Bone Jt Open. 2025; 6(1):43-52.

PMID: 39778602 PMC: 11712530. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0113.R1.


Synovial vancomycin and meropenem concentrations in periprosthetic joint infection treated by single-stage revision combined with intra-articular infusion.

Zou C, Guo W, Mu W, Wahafu T, Li Y, Hua L Bone Joint Res. 2024; 13(10):535-545.

PMID: 39353609 PMC: 11444796. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.1310.BJR-2024-0024.R2.


[Low UKA implantation volume, comorbidities, male sex, and implantation of constrained TKA are risk factors for septic revision after knee arthroplasty implantation : A register-based study from the German Arthroplasty Register].

Szymski D, Walter N, Straub J, Wu Y, Melsheimer O, Grimberg A Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024; 53(11):883-892.

PMID: 39283334 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-024-04562-y.


[Acute postoperative infections after dual head arthroplasty in geriatric patients].

Baertl S, Renz N, Alt V, Perka C, Kirschbaum S Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2023; 127(2):110-116.

PMID: 37853237 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-023-01376-z.

References
1.
Triantafyllopoulos G, Soranoglou V, Memtsoudis S, Sculco T, Poultsides L . Rate and Risk Factors for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Among 36,494 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2017; 33(4):1166-1170. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.040. View

2.
de Jong L, Klem T, Kuijper T, Roukema G . Factors affecting the rate of surgical site infection in patients after hemiarthroplasty of the hip following a fracture of the neck of the femur. Bone Joint J. 2017; 99-B(8):1088-1094. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B8.BJJ-2016-1119.R1. View

3.
Frihagen F, Comeau-Gauthier M, Axelrod D, Bzovsky S, Poolman R, Heels-Ansdell D . Who, if anyone, may benefit from a total hip arthroplasty after a displaced femoral neck fracture?: a post hoc subgroup analysis of the HEALTH trial. Bone Jt Open. 2022; 3(8):611-617. PMC: 9422900. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.38.BJO-2022-0074.R1. View

4.
Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis J . World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporos Int. 1997; 7(5):407-13. DOI: 10.1007/pl00004148. View

5.
Jansson V, Grimberg A, Melsheimer O, Perka C, Steinbruck A . Orthopaedic registries: the German experience. EFORT Open Rev. 2019; 4(6):401-408. PMC: 6549118. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180064. View