» Articles » PMID: 37190322

Characterization of Tumor and Immune Tumor Microenvironment of Primary Tumors and Metastatic Sites in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Based on Response to Nivolumab Immunotherapy: Preliminary Results from the Meet-URO 18 Study

Abstract

Background: Prognostic and predictive factors for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with immunotherapy are highly warranted, and the immune tumor microenvironment (I-TME) is under investigation.

Methods: The Meet-URO 18 was a multicentric retrospective study assessing the I-TME in mRCC patients treated with ≥2nd-line nivolumab, dichotomized into and according to progression-free survival (≥12 months and ≤3 months, respectively). The primary objective was to identify differential immunohistochemical (IHC) patterns between the two groups. Lymphocyte infiltration and the expressions of different proteins on tumor cells (CD56, CD15, CD68, and ph-mTOR) were analyzed. The expression of PD-L1 was also assessed.

Results: A total of 116 tumor tissue samples from 84 patients (59% were primary tumors and 41% were metastases) were evaluated. Samples from (N = 55) were significantly associated with lower expression of CD4+ T lymphocytes and higher levels of ph-mTOR and CD56+ compared with samples from (N = 61). also showed a higher CD3+ expression ( = 0.059) and CD8+/CD4+ ratio ( = 0.084). were significantly associated with a higher percentage of clear cell histology and grading.

Conclusions: Differential IHC patterns between the tumors in patients who were and to nivolumab were identified. Further investigation with genomic analyses is planned.

Citing Articles

Prognostic Value of G8 Geriatric Screening and Meet-URO Scores in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Receiving First-Line Ipilimumab-Nivolumab Combination Immunotherapy.

Nagpal R, Campione M, Rebuzzi S, Fratino L, Rescigno P, Bracarda S Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2025; 24:15330338251316626.

PMID: 39989333 PMC: 11848895. DOI: 10.1177/15330338251316626.


Tumor microenvironment and clinical efficacy of first line immunotherapy-based combinations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Sammarco E, Rossetti M, Salfi A, Bonato A, Viacava P, Masi G Med Oncol. 2024; 41(6):150.

PMID: 38740647 PMC: 11090963. DOI: 10.1007/s12032-024-02370-0.


Analyses of tumor microenvironment in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving immunotherapy (Meet-URO 18 study).

Catalano F, Brunelli M, Signori A, Rescigno P, Buti S, Galli L Future Oncol. 2024; 20(21):1495-1503.

PMID: 38682738 PMC: 11441071. DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-1068.


MOICS, a novel classier deciphering immune heterogeneity and aid precise management of clear cell renal cell carcinoma at multiomics level.

Liu Y, Qi L, Ye B, Wang A, Lu J, Qu L Cancer Biol Ther. 2024; 25(1):2345977.

PMID: 38659199 PMC: 11057626. DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2024.2345977.

References
1.
Vano Y, Elaidi R, Bennamoun M, Chevreau C, Borchiellini D, Pannier D . Nivolumab, nivolumab-ipilimumab, and VEGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line treatment for metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (BIONIKK): a biomarker-driven, open-label, non-comparative, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022; 23(5):612-624. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00128-0. View

2.
Zhuang T, Case K, Olsen T, Brown J, Carthon B, Kucuk O . Metastatic Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Therapies and Ongoing Trials. Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(12). PMC: 9220801. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122867. View

3.
Motzer R, Escudier B, Mcdermott D, George S, Hammers H, Srinivas S . Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373(19):1803-13. PMC: 5719487. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510665. View

4.
Houshyari M, Taghizadeh-Hesary F . Is Mitochondrial Metabolism a New Predictive Biomarker for Antiprogrammed Cell Death Protein-1 Immunotherapy?. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022; 19(3):123-124. DOI: 10.1200/OP.22.00733. View

5.
Braun C, Weichhart T . mTOR-dependent immunometabolism as Achilles' heel of anticancer therapy. Eur J Immunol. 2021; 51(12):3161-3175. DOI: 10.1002/eji.202149270. View