» Articles » PMID: 37185670

Fragmentation of Hydrophilic Guidewire Coatings During Neuroendovascular Therapy

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Radiology
Date 2023 May 15
PMID 37185670
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Cerebral polymer coating embolism from intravascular devices may cause serious complications after endovascular therapy (EVT) for neurovascular diseases. Although polymer fragments are often created during endovascular procedures, exact mechanisms of their formation, especially if of small size, are largely unknown.

Methods: In this study eight microguidewires (Asahi Chikai 200 cm (Asahi Intecc, Aichi, Japan), Asahi Chikai Black (Asahi Intecc), Fathom™ (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA), Hybrid (Balt Extrusion, Montmorency, France), Radifocus® Guide Wire GT (Terumo, Leuven, Belgium), Synchro® (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA), Transend™ EX (Boston Scientific), and Traxcess™ (MicroVention®, Tustin, CA, USA)) frequently used during EVT were investigated ex vivo using their dedicated metal or plastic insertion tools to assess for coating delamination after backloading of the microguidewires.

Results: Backloading caused damage to the coating of all microguidewires especially when the main body of the guidewires was bent in front of the insertion tool. All studied microguidewires produced microscopic filamentous and/or band-like coating fragments. Few larger irregular fragments were observed, but also very small fragments measuring 1-3 µm in diameter were found. Spectroscopic measurements of polymer fragments and microguidewires identified various polymers.

Conclusion: Backloading of polymer-coated microguidewires during EVT should be minimized if possible. More stable hydrophilic coatings on microguidewires and less traumatic insertion tools are desirable.

Citing Articles

Hydrophilic polymer coating delamination during neurointerventional treatment after microcatheter withdrawal: particulate identification through attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy.

Muller S, Albina-Palmarola P, Konieczny S, Manke G, Fischer S, Henkes H Front Neurol. 2025; 15:1479375.

PMID: 39882360 PMC: 11774725. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1479375.

References
1.
Chopra A, Mehta M, Bismuth J, Shapiro M, Fishbein M, Bridges A . Polymer coating embolism from intravascular medical devices - a clinical literature review. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2017; 30:45-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.carpath.2017.06.004. View

2.
Mehta R, Mehta R . Polymer-induced central nervous system complications following vascular procedures: spectrum of iatrogenic injuries and review of outcomes. Hum Pathol. 2016; 53:178-90. PMC: 4920140. DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2016.01.018. View

3.
Shapiro M, Ollenschleger M, Baccin C, Becske T, Spiegel G, Wang Y . Foreign Body Emboli following Cerebrovascular Interventions: Clinical, Radiographic, and Histopathologic Features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015; 36(11):2121-6. PMC: 7964857. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4415. View

4.
Ansari S, Anderson R, Caron M, Shaibani A, Hurley M, Jahromi B . Hydrophilic polymer embolic complication during diagnostic cerebral angiography presenting with delayed intracranial hemorrhage: case report and literature review. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018; 11(1):80-83. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014189. View

5.
Barnwell S, DAGOSTINO A, SHAPIRO S, Nesbit G, Kellogg J . Foreign bodies in small arteries after use of an infusion microcatheter. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997; 18(10):1886-9. PMC: 8337381. View