» Articles » PMID: 37181264

Sex Difference in Lower-limb Electromyography and Kinematics when Using Resistance Bands During a Barbell Back Squat

Overview
Journal J Hum Kinet
Publisher Termedia
Date 2023 May 14
PMID 37181264
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the muscle activity of the gluteus medius (GMe), gluteus maximus (GMa), biceps femoris (BF), vastus lateralis (VL), vastus medialis (VM) and erector spinae (ES) as well as medial knee displacement (MKD) while using varying stiffness resistance bands (red: 1.68 kg; black: 3.31 kg; gold: 6.44 kg) during a barbell back squat (BBS) among males and females. A total of 23 (females: 11) resistance trained people were recruited for this study. Muscle activity was measured using electromyography, and motion capture cameras tracked lower-limb kinematics and MKD. Three resistance bands were placed at the distal end of the femur while performing a BBS at their 85% repetition maximum (RM). Parametric and non-parametric statistical analyses were conducted with the alpha level of 0.05. The gold resistance band resulted in a smaller knee-width-index value (i.e., greater MKD) compared to other bands (p < 0.01). Males exhibited less MKD compared to females during the BBS for each resistance band (p = 0.04). Males produced greater VL activity when using the black and gold resistance bands during the BBS (p = 0.03). When using a gold resistance band, the GMe muscle activation was higher compared to other resistance bands (p < 0.01). VM muscle activity was reduced when using a gold resistance band compared to no band condition (p < 0.01). BF (p = 0.39) and ES (p = 0.88) muscle activity did not change when using different resistance bands. As a result, females may be at a biomechanical disadvantage when using resistance bands compared to males while performing the BBS hindering them from optimal performance.

Citing Articles

The Use of Elastic Resistance Bands to Reduce Dynamic Knee Valgus in Squat-Based Movements: A Narrative Review.

Forman D, Alizadeh S, Button D, Holmes M Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023; 18(5):1206-1217.

PMID: 37795322 PMC: 10547095. DOI: 10.26603/001c.87764.

References
1.
ESCAMILLA R . Knee biomechanics of the dynamic squat exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001; 33(1):127-41. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200101000-00020. View

2.
DeJong A, Mangum L, Resch J, Saliba S . Detection of Gluteal Changes Using Ultrasound Imaging During Phases of Gait in Individuals With Medial Knee Displacement. J Sport Rehabil. 2018; 28(5):494-504. DOI: 10.1123/jsr.2017-0336. View

3.
Stiffler M, Pennuto A, Smith M, Olson M, Bell D . Range of motion, postural alignment, and LESS score differences of those with and without excessive medial knee displacement. Clin J Sport Med. 2014; 25(1):61-6. DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000106. View

4.
Myer G, Ford K, Barber Foss K, Goodman A, Ceasar A, Rauh M . The incidence and potential pathomechanics of patellofemoral pain in female athletes. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2010; 25(7):700-7. PMC: 2900391. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.04.001. View

5.
Hewett T, Myer G, Ford K, Heidt Jr R, Colosimo A, McLean S . Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33(4):492-501. DOI: 10.1177/0363546504269591. View