Review of Filters for Air Sampling and Chemical Analysis in Mining Workplaces

Overview

Journal Minerals (Basel)

Date 2023 May 14

PMID 37180428

Authors

Judith C Chow

John G Watson

Xiaoliang Wang

Behrooz Abbasi

Wm Randolph Reed

David Parks

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

This review considers the use of filters to sample air in mining workplace environments for dust concentration measurement and subsequent analysis of hazardous contaminants, especially respirable crystalline silica (RCS) on filters compatible with wearable personal dust monitors (PDM). The review summarizes filter vendors, sizes, costs, chemical and physical properties, and information available on filter modeling, laboratory testing, and field performance. Filter media testing and selection should consider the characteristics required for mass by gravimetry in addition to RCS quantification by Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) or Raman spectroscopic analysis. For mass determination, the filters need to have high filtration efficiency (≥99% for the most penetrable particle sizes) and a reasonable pressure drop (up to 16.7 kPa) to accommodate high dust loading. Additional requirements include: negligible uptake of water vapor and gaseous volatile compounds; adequate particle adhesion as a function of particle loading; sufficient particle loading capacity to form a stable particle deposit layer during sampling in wet and dusty environments; mechanical strength to withstand vibrations and pressure drops across the filter; and appropriate filter mass compatible with the tapered element oscillating microbalance. FTIR and Raman measurements require filters to be free of spectral interference. Furthermore, because the irradiated area does not completely cover the sample deposit, particles should be uniformly deposited on the filter.

References

Gilbert J, Sartim R, Suringar M, Richards J . Positive bias in particulate matter emissions data due to sulfur dioxide adsorption and oxidation on glass fiber filters. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2021; 71(9):1076-1084. DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2021.1902881. View

Breuer D . Flow resistance of samplers for personal monitoring in work areas and requirements for sampling pump performance. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2012; 9(2):D25-32. DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2011.640302. View

Kildeso J, Nielsen B . Exposure assessment of airborne microorganisms by fluorescence microscopy and image processing. Ann Occup Hyg. 1997; 41(2):201-16. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4878(96)00035-x. View

Lilienfeld P, Dulchinos J . Portable instantaneous mass monitor for coal mine dust. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1972; 33(3):136-45. DOI: 10.1080/0002889728506623. View

SPURNY K . [Membrane filters in aerosology. II. Filtration mechanisms in membrane filters]. Zentralbl Biol Aerosolforsch. 1965; 12(6):530-45. View

Watson J, Chow J, Chen L, Frank N . Methods to assess carbonaceous aerosol sampling artifacts for IMPROVE and other long-term networks. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2009; 59(8):898-911. DOI: 10.3155/1047-3289.59.8.898. View

Hidy G, Mueller P, Altshuler S, Chow J, Watson J . Air quality measurements-From rubber bands to tapping the rainbow. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2017; 67(6):637-668. DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2017.1308890. View

Sherwood R, GREENHALGH D . A personal air sampler. Ann Occup Hyg. 1960; 2:127-32. View

DAVIES C, Aylward M . Photoelectric measurement of coal dust stains of filter paper. Br J Ind Med. 1949; 6(4):254-8. PMC: 1036243. DOI: 10.1136/oem.6.4.254. View

10.

Cahill T, Ashbaugh L, Barone J, Eldred R, Feeney P, Flocchini R . Analysis of respirable fractions in atmospheric particulates via sequential filtration. J Air Pollut Control Assoc. 1977; 27(7):675-8. DOI: 10.1080/00022470.1977.10470474. View

11.

Page S, Volkwein J . A revised conversion factor relating respirable dust concentrations measured by 10 mm Dorr-Oliver nylon cyclones operated at 1.7 and 2.0 L min(-1). J Environ Monit. 2009; 11(3):684-9. DOI: 10.1039/b817922k. View

12.

Hering S, Cass G . The Magnitude of Bias in the Measurement of PM25 Arising from Volatilization of Particulate Nitrate from Teflon Filters. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2015; 49(6):725-33. DOI: 10.1080/10473289.1999.10463843. View

13.

Cai H, Chen M, Chen Q, Du F, Liu J, Shi H . Microplastic quantification affected by structure and pore size of filters. Chemosphere. 2020; 257:127198. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127198. View

14.

Zheng L, Kulkarni P, Birch M, Ashley K, Wei S . Analysis of Crystalline Silica Aerosol Using Portable Raman Spectrometry: Feasibility of Near Real-Time Measurement. Anal Chem. 2018; 90(10):6229-6239. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00830. View

15.

Chow J, Watson J, Chen L, Arnott W, Moosmuller H, Fung K . Equivalence of elemental carbon by thermal/optical reflectance and transmittance with different temperature protocols. Environ Sci Technol. 2004; 38(16):4414-22. DOI: 10.1021/es034936u. View

16.

Haig C, Mackay W, Walker J, Williams C . Bioaerosol sampling: sampling mechanisms, bioefficiency and field studies. J Hosp Infect. 2016; 93(3):242-55. PMC: 7124364. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.03.017. View

17.

Tsai C, Chang C, Aggarwal S, Li S, Chein H, Shih T . The effect of environmental conditions and electrical charge on the weighing accuracy of different filter materials. Sci Total Environ. 2002; 293(1-3):201-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0048-9697(02)00015-3. View

18.

Cauda E, Miller A, Drake P . Promoting early exposure monitoring for respirable crystalline silica: Taking the laboratory to the mine site. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015; 13(3):D39-45. PMC: 5576139. DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1116691. View

19.

Pampena J, Cauda E, Chubb L, Meadows J . Use of the Field-Based Silica Monitoring Technique in a Coal Mine: A Case Study. Min Metall Explor. 2022; 37(2):717-726. PMC: 9278548. DOI: 10.1007/s42461-019-00161-0. View

20.

Chow J, Watson J, Lowenthal D, Hackney R, Magliano K, Lehrman D . Temporal Variations of PM, PM, and Gaseous Precursors during the 1995 Integrated Monitoring Study in Central California. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2017; 49(9):16-24. DOI: 10.1080/10473289.1999.10463909. View