» Articles » PMID: 37177129

Influence of Crosslinking Methods on Biomimetically Mineralized Collagen Matrices for Bone-like Biomaterials

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 May 13
PMID 37177129
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To assist in bone defect repair, ideal bone regeneration scaffolds should exhibit good osteoconductivity and osteoinductivity, but for load-bearing applications, they should also have mechanical properties that emulate those of native bone. The use of biomimetic processing methods for the mineralization of collagen fibrils has resulted in interpenetrating composites that mimic the nanostructure of native bone; however, closely matching the mechanical properties of bone on a larger scale is something that is still yet to be achieved. In this study, four different collagen crosslinking methods (EDC-NHS, quercetin, methacrylated collagen, and riboflavin) are compared and combined with biomimetic mineralization via the polymer-induced liquid-precursor (PILP) process, to obtain bone-like collagen-hydroxyapatite composites. Densified fibrillar collagen scaffolds were fabricated, crosslinked, and biomimetically mineralized using the PILP process, and the effect of each crosslinking method on the degree of mineralization, tensile strength, and modulus of the mineralized scaffolds were analyzed and compared. Improved modulus and tensile strength values were obtained using EDC-NHS and riboflavin crosslinking methods, while quercetin and methacrylated collagen resulted in little to no increase in mechanical properties. Decreased mineral contents appear to be necessary for retaining tensile strength, suggesting that mineral content should be kept below a percolation threshold to optimize properties of these interpenetrating nanocomposites. This work supports the premise that a combination of collagen crosslinking and biomimetic mineralization methods may provide solutions for fabricating robust bone-like composites on a larger scale.

Citing Articles

Dynamic-Cross-Linked, Regulated, and Controllable Mineralization Degree and Morphology of Collagen Biomineralization.

Geng Z, Xu F, Liu Y, Qiao A, Du T J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(12.

PMID: 39728156 PMC: 11728303. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15120356.


The Influence of Various Crosslinking Conditions of EDC/NHS on the Properties of Fish Collagen Film.

Sionkowska A, Kulka-Kaminska K, Brudzynska P, Lewandowska K, Piwowarski L Mar Drugs. 2024; 22(5).

PMID: 38786585 PMC: 11123180. DOI: 10.3390/md22050194.

References
1.
Wingender B, Bradley P, Saxena N, Ruberti J, Gower L . Biomimetic organization of collagen matrices to template bone-like microstructures. Matrix Biol. 2016; 52-54:384-396. DOI: 10.1016/j.matbio.2016.02.004. View

2.
Sorensen E, Hojrup P, Petersen T . Posttranslational modifications of bovine osteopontin: identification of twenty-eight phosphorylation and three O-glycosylation sites. Protein Sci. 1995; 4(10):2040-9. PMC: 2142990. DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560041009. View

3.
Wang Y, Azais T, Robin M, Vallee A, Catania C, Legriel P . The predominant role of collagen in the nucleation, growth, structure and orientation of bone apatite. Nat Mater. 2012; 11(8):724-33. DOI: 10.1038/nmat3362. View

4.
Buckwalter J, COOPER R . Bone structure and function. Instr Course Lect. 1987; 36:27-48. View

5.
Drzewiecki K, Malavade J, Ahmed I, Lowe C, Shreiber D . A thermoreversible, photocrosslinkable collagen bio-ink for free-form fabrication of scaffolds for regenerative medicine. Technology (Singap World Sci). 2018; 5(4):185-195. PMC: 5845803. DOI: 10.1142/S2339547817500091. View