» Articles » PMID: 37176579

Fixed Versus Unfixed Combination of Topical Latanoprost/Timolol for Glaucoma: An Observational Study Investigating the Level of Adherence and Ocular Surface Health

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 May 13
PMID 37176579
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of fixed combination versus concomitant unfixed topical glaucoma treatment on patients' adherence and ocular surface health.

Patients And Methods: This is a 6-month, prospective, parallel-group, observational study in patients with ocular hypertension (OHT), primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), or exfoliation glaucoma (XFG). A total of 142 patients with similar baseline characteristics were enrolled in this study. Seventy-one patients received a Latanoprost 0.005%/Timolol 0.5% fixed combination in the evening, whereas seventy-one patients received the unfixed treatment with Latanoprost 0.005% in the evening and Timolol 0.5% twice daily. The primary outcome was the adherence rate at baseline, and at the 3- and 6-month follow-up visits. The secondary outcomes included the signs of ocular surface disease (OSD) and intraocular pressure (IOP).

Results: The adherence of patients treated with the fixed combination was higher than the unfixed treatment at the 3-month (78.0% vs. 63.0%, < 0.001) and at the 6-month visits (73.0% vs. 58.5%, < 0.01). The Break-up Time, Schirmer test, and Van Bijsterveld score were worse in the unfixed group at baseline and all subsequent examinations ( < 0.05 for all comparisons). There were no differences in the mean IOP between groups at baseline, 1-, and 3-month visits. IOP appears higher in the unfixed group at 6 months (16.7 vs. 15.0 mmHg, < 0.01).

Conclusion: The patients with ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma treated with a fixed combination are significantly more adherent and show a healthier ocular surface than those treated with an unfixed combination. The study provides significant evidence of the benefits of fixed combination treatment.

Citing Articles

Prescribing trends of glaucoma medication in Korea from 2007 to 2020: A nationwide population-based study.

Na K, Lee W, Choi Y, Park S PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0305619.

PMID: 38990957 PMC: 11238952. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305619.

References
1.
Yadav A, Patel V . Drug use in primary open angle glaucoma: a prospective study at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Indian J Pharmacol. 2013; 45(2):117-20. PMC: 3660920. DOI: 10.4103/0253-7613.108279. View

2.
Kaur I, Lal S, Rana C, Kakkar S, Singh H . Ocular preservatives: associated risks and newer options. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2009; 28(3):93-103. DOI: 10.1080/15569520902995834. View

3.
Cho H, Park M, Moon J . Effects of antiglaucoma drugs on the ocular surface in rabbits: a fixed-combination drug versus two concomitant drugs. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2011; 55(6):670-5. DOI: 10.1007/s10384-011-0078-3. View

4.
Reardon G, Kotak S, Schwartz G . Objective assessment of compliance and persistence among patients treated for glaucoma and ocular hypertension: a systematic review. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011; 5:441-63. PMC: 3191921. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S23780. View

5.
Rossi G, Pasinetti G, Sandolo F, Bordin M, Bianchi P . From dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% to brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination: a 6-month, multicenter, open-label tolerability switch study. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2011; 12(16):2425-31. DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2011.589384. View