» Articles » PMID: 37174564

Multimodal Communication in the Human-Cat Relationship: A Pilot Study

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2023 May 13
PMID 37174564
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Across all species, communication implies that an emitter sends signals to a receiver, through one or more channels. Cats can integrate visual and auditory signals sent by humans and modulate their behaviour according to the valence of the emotion perceived. However, the specific patterns and channels governing cat-to-human communication are poorly understood. This study addresses whether, in an extraspecific interaction, cats are sensitive to the communication channel used by their human interlocutor. We examined three types of interactions-vocal, visual, and bimodal-by coding video clips of 12 cats living in cat cafés. In a fourth (control) condition, the human interlocutor refrained from emitting any communication signal. We found that the modality of communication had a significant effect on the latency in the time taken for cats to approach the human experimenter. Cats interacted significantly faster to visual and bimodal communication compared to the "no communication" pattern, as well as to vocal communication. In addition, communication modality had a significant effect on tail-wagging behaviour. Cats displayed significantly more tail wagging when the experimenter engaged in no communication (control condition) compared to visual and bimodal communication modes, indicating that they were less comfortable in this control condition. Cats also displayed more tail wagging in response to vocal communication compared to the bimodal communication. Overall, our data suggest that cats display a marked preference for both visual and bimodal cues addressed by non-familiar humans compared to vocal cues only. Results arising from the present study may serve as a basis for practical recommendations to navigate the codes of human-cat interactions.

Citing Articles

Listen to Us: Perceptions of Animal Voice and Agency.

Thomsen A, Borrie W, Miller K, Cardilini A Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(20).

PMID: 37893995 PMC: 10603673. DOI: 10.3390/ani13203271.


Home Sweet Home: The Impact of Lifestyle on a Cat's Approach to Impossible Tasks in the Home Environment.

Scandurra A, Di Lucrezia A, DAniello B, Pinelli C Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(16).

PMID: 37627470 PMC: 10451177. DOI: 10.3390/ani13162679.

References
1.
Ben-Aderet T, Gallego-Abenza M, Reby D, Mathevon N . Dog-directed speech: why do we use it and do dogs pay attention to it?. Proc Biol Sci. 2017; 284(1846). PMC: 5247504. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2429. View

2.
Benjamin A, Slocombe K . 'Who's a good boy?!' Dogs prefer naturalistic dog-directed speech. Anim Cogn. 2018; 21(3):353-364. PMC: 5908831. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-018-1172-4. View

3.
Humphrey T, Proops L, Forman J, Spooner R, McComb K . The role of cat eye narrowing movements in cat-human communication. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):16503. PMC: 7536207. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73426-0. View

4.
Jeannin S, Gilbert C, Amy M, Leboucher G . Pet-directed speech draws adult dogs' attention more efficiently than Adult-directed speech. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):4980. PMC: 5504008. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-04671-z. View

5.
Miklosi A, Polgardi R, Topal J, Csanyi V . Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs. Anim Cogn. 2014; 1(2):113-21. DOI: 10.1007/s100710050016. View