» Articles » PMID: 37174189

Experimental Setups for In Vitro Studies on Radon Exposure in Mammalian Cells-A Critical Overview

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 May 13
PMID 37174189
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Naturally occurring radon and its short lived progeny are the second leading cause of lung cancer after smoking, and the main risk factor for non-smokers. The radon progeny, mainly Polonium-218 (Po) and Polonium-214 (Po), are responsible for the highest dose deposition in the bronchial epithelium via alpha-decay. These alpha-particles release a large amount of energy over a short penetration range, which results in severe and complex DNA damage. In order to unravel the underlying biological mechanisms which are triggered by this complex DNA damage and eventually give rise to carcinogenesis, in vitro radiobiology experiments on mammalian cells have been performed using radon exposure setups, or radon analogues, which mimic alpha-particle exposure. This review provides an overview of the different experimental setups, which have been developed and used over the past decades for in vitro radon experiments. In order to guarantee reliable results, the design and dosimetry of these setups require careful consideration, which will be emphasized in this work. Results of these in vitro experiments, particularly on bronchial epithelial cells, can provide valuable information on biomarkers, which can assist to identify exposures, as well as to study the effects of localized high dose depositions and the heterogeneous dose distribution of radon.

Citing Articles

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Inflammatory Biomarkers in Individuals Exposed to Radon.

Lesbek A, Omori Y, Bakhtin M, Kazymbet P, Tokonami S, Altaeva N Biomedicines. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 40002912 PMC: 11853710. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13020499.


Radiation Detection-CD/DVD, Glass, and Emerging Materials for Radon Exposure Assessment.

Rathebe P, Kholopo M Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(23).

PMID: 39686210 PMC: 11645005. DOI: 10.3390/s24237674.

References
1.
Blyth B, Sykes P . Radiation-induced bystander effects: what are they, and how relevant are they to human radiation exposures?. Radiat Res. 2011; 176(2):139-57. DOI: 10.1667/rr2548.1. View

2.
Cinelli G, Tollefsen T, Bossew P, Gruber V, Bogucarskis K, De Felice L . Digital version of the European Atlas of natural radiation. J Environ Radioact. 2018; 196:240-252. PMC: 6290173. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.02.008. View

3.
Leach J, Morrisey E . Repairing the lungs one breath at a time: How dedicated or facultative are you?. Genes Dev. 2018; 32(23-24):1461-1471. PMC: 6295169. DOI: 10.1101/gad.319418.118. View

4.
Gaillard S, Pusset D, de Toledo S, Fromm M, Azzam E . Propagation distance of the alpha-particle-induced bystander effect: the role of nuclear traversal and gap junction communication. Radiat Res. 2009; 171(5):513-20. PMC: 2717798. DOI: 10.1667/RR1658.1. View

5.
Steck D, Field R . Dosimetric challenges for residential radon epidemiology. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2006; 69(7):655-64. DOI: 10.1080/15287390500261141. View