» Articles » PMID: 37168417

Contemporary Trends and Barriers to Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation During DOAC Predominant Era

Abstract

There is a need to reassess contemporary oral anticoagulation (OAC) trends and barriers against guideline directed therapy in the United States. Most previous studies were performed before major guideline changes recommended direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use over warfarin or have otherwise lacked patient level data. Data on overuse of OAC in low-risk group is also limited. To address these knowledge gaps, we performed a nationwide analysis to analyze current trends. This is a retrospective cohort study assessing non-valvular AF identified using a large United States de-identified administrative claims database, including commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollees. Prescription fills were assessed within a 90-day follow-up from the patient's index AF encounter between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020. Among the 339,197 AF patients, 4.4%, 8.0%, and 87.6% were in the low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups (according to CHADS-VASc score). An over (29.6%) and under (52.2%) utilization of OAC was reported in low- and high-risk AF patients. A considerably high frequency for warfarin use was also noted among high-risk group patients taking OAC (33.1%). The results suggest that anticoagulation use for stroke prevention in the United States is still comparable to the pre-DOAC era studies. About half of newly diagnosed high-risk non-valvular AF patients remain unprotected against stroke risk. Several predictors of OAC and DOAC use were also identified. Our findings may identify a population at risk of complications due to under- or over-treatment and highlight the need for future quality improvement efforts.

Citing Articles

Towards improved detection of subclinical atrial fibrillation - Who could benefit from targeted screening?.

Fender A, Dobrev D Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025; 55:101550.

PMID: 39911612 PMC: 11795694. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101550.


Inflammatory gut-heart interactions: Is there a link between inflammatory bowel disease and atrial fibrillation?.

Dobrev D, Fender A Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025; 55:101537.

PMID: 39911611 PMC: 11795676. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101537.


Protease-activated receptor 2 at the intersection of thrombo-inflammation and beyond.

Fender A, Dobrev D Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024; 52:101403.

PMID: 38854742 PMC: 11156694. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101403.


Effectiveness, utilisation and cost associated with implantable loop recorders versus external monitors after ischaemic or cryptogenic stroke.

Dhruva S, Murillo J, Ameli O, Chaisson C, Redberg R, Cohen K Open Heart. 2024; 11(1).

PMID: 38719499 PMC: 11086550. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002714.

References
1.
Rowan S, Bailey D, Bublitz C, Anderson R . Trends in anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in the U.S.: an analysis of the national ambulatory medical care survey database. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49(14):1561-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.11.045. View

2.
Kamel H, Healey J . Cardioembolic Stroke. Circ Res. 2017; 120(3):514-526. PMC: 5312810. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308407. View

3.
Neuman P, Jacobson G . Medicare Advantage Checkup. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379(22):2163-2172. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMhpr1804089. View

4.
Wheelock K, Ross J, Murugiah K, Lin Z, Krumholz H, Khera R . Clinician Trends in Prescribing Direct Oral Anticoagulants for US Medicare Beneficiaries. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(12):e2137288. PMC: 8649845. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.37288. View

5.
Steinberg B, Kim S, Thomas L, Fonarow G, Hylek E, Ansell J . Lack of concordance between empirical scores and physician assessments of stroke and bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation: results from the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) registry. Circulation. 2014; 129(20):2005-12. PMC: 4050636. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.008643. View