» Articles » PMID: 37167545

Accelerated Enveloping Distribution Sampling to Probe the Presence of Water Molecules

Overview
Specialties Biochemistry
Chemistry
Date 2023 May 11
PMID 37167545
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Determining the presence of water molecules at protein-ligand interfaces is still a challenging task in free-energy calculations. The inappropriate placement of water molecules results in the stabilization of wrong conformational orientations of the ligand. With classical alchemical perturbation methods, such as thermodynamic integration (TI), it is essential to know the amount of water molecules in the active site of the respective ligands. However, the resolution of the crystal structure and the correct assignment of the electron density do not always lead to a clear placement of water molecules. In this work, we apply the one-step perturbation method named accelerated enveloping distribution sampling (AEDS) to determine the presence of water molecules in the active site by probing them in a fast and straightforward way. Based on these results, we combined the AEDS method with standard TI to calculate accurate binding free energies in the presence of buried water molecules. The main idea is to perturb the water molecules with AEDS such that they are allowed to alternate between regular water molecules and non-interacting dummy particles while treating the ligand with TI over an alchemical pathway. We demonstrate the use of AEDS to probe the presence of water molecules for six different test systems. For one of these, previous calculations showed difficulties to reproduce the experimental binding free energies, and here, we use the combined TI-AEDS approach to tackle these issues.

Citing Articles

Current State of Open Source Force Fields in Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Predictions.

Hahn D, Gapsys V, de Groot B, Mobley D, Tresadern G J Chem Inf Model. 2024; 64(13):5063-5076.

PMID: 38895959 PMC: 11234369. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00417.

References
1.
King E, Aitchison E, Li H, Luo R . Recent Developments in Free Energy Calculations for Drug Discovery. Front Mol Biosci. 2021; 8:712085. PMC: 8387144. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.712085. View

2.
Cumming J, Smith E, Wang L, Misiaszek J, Durkin J, Pan J . Structure based design of iminohydantoin BACE1 inhibitors: identification of an orally available, centrally active BACE1 inhibitor. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2012; 22(7):2444-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.02.013. View

3.
Maurer M, de Beer S, Oostenbrink C . Calculation of Relative Binding Free Energy in the Water-Filled Active Site of Oligopeptide-Binding Protein A. Molecules. 2016; 21(4):499. PMC: 5881882. DOI: 10.3390/molecules21040499. View

4.
Ekberg V, Samways M, Misini Ignjatovic M, Essex J, Ryde U . Comparison of Grand Canonical and Conventional Molecular Dynamics Simulation Methods for Protein-Bound Water Networks. ACS Phys Chem Au. 2022; 2(3):247-259. PMC: 9136951. DOI: 10.1021/acsphyschemau.1c00052. View

5.
Ross G, Bodnarchuk M, Essex J . Water Sites, Networks, And Free Energies with Grand Canonical Monte Carlo. J Am Chem Soc. 2015; 137(47):14930-43. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b07940. View