» Articles » PMID: 37167247

False Memory in a Second Language: The Importance of Controlling the Knowledge of Word Meaning

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2023 May 11
PMID 37167247
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the globalized world we live in, it is increasingly common for people to speak more than one language. Although research in psychology has been widely interested in the study of false memories with the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm, to date, there is a scarcity of studies comparing false memories in the first and the second language (L1 and L2, respectively). It is noteworthy that one of the most studied variables in the DRM paradigm, the backward associative strength (BAS), has hardly been studied in the L2. Moreover, the only study that recently examined this matter found differences in the knowledge of L2-word meaning between the high-BAS and low-BAS lists, which would hinder the interpretation of the BAS effect in L2 false memories. Taking all this into account, the current work examined false memories in the L1 (Spanish) and the L2 (English) as a function of BAS overcoming the limitations of the previous study. We selected DRM lists using both Spanish and English free association norms and lists were constructed to vary in BAS values while controlling the knowledge of word meaning. Results showed that false recognition was greater in the L1 or dominant language than in the L2 or non-dominant language. Furthermore, BAS modulated the false recognition in both the L1 and the L2. That is, false recognition was higher in high-BAS than low-BAS lists in both languages. Sensitivity index from the signal-detection theory helped us gain further insight into these results. The main findings are discussed in the light of theoretical models from both the false memory and the second language processing literature. Finally, practical implications and future research are provided.

Citing Articles

False memory in between-language conditions: a brief review on the effect of encoding and retrieving in different languages.

Beato M, Suarez M, Cadavid S, Albuquerque P Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1237471.

PMID: 37637899 PMC: 10448188. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1237471.

References
1.
Knott L, Howe M, Wimmer M, Dewhurst S . The development of automatic and controlled inhibitory retrieval processes in true and false recall. J Exp Child Psychol. 2011; 109(1):91-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.01.001. View

2.
Roman P, Gomez-Gomez I . Changes in Native Sentence Processing Related to Bilingualism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Psychol. 2022; 13:757023. PMC: 8898929. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.757023. View

3.
Coane J, Huff M, Hutchison K . The ironic effect of guessing: increased false memory for mediated lists in younger and older adults. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2015; 23(3):282-303. PMC: 4783188. DOI: 10.1080/13825585.2015.1088506. View

4.
Bodner G, Huff M, Lamontagne R, Azad T . Getting at the source of distinctive encoding effects in the DRM paradigm: evidence from signal-detection measures and source judgments. Memory. 2016; 25(5):647-655. DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1205094. View

5.
Marian V, Blumenfeld H, Kaushanskaya M . The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007; 50(4):940-67. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067). View