Seeing Far: Abstract Construal and Visual Distance Judgments

Overview

Journal Psychon Bull Rev

Specialty Psychology

Date 2023 May 11

PMID 37166704

Authors

Eugene Y Chan

Sam J Maglio

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

construal underlies mental travel. As a result, the human mind associates abstraction and psychological distance, whereby prompting abstract construal begets the inference of psychological distance - in time, social distance, hypotheticality, and physical space. That final distance is the only dimension that can be appraised visually, so would abstract construal impact judgments related to perceived visual distance? Two experiments provide evidence that abstract construal causes targets in the visual field to be judged as physically farther away. Further, the exacerbated sense of distance gives rise to related inferences about those visual targets (size and weight). These results deepen and broaden Construal Level Theory with practical implications for how people reason about the physical properties of objects - including but not limited to their physical distance.

References

Alter A, Oppenheimer D . Effects of fluency on psychological distance and mental construal (or why New York is a large city, but New York is a civilized jungle). Psychol Sci. 2008; 19(2):161-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02062.x. View

Balcetis E, Dunning D . See what you want to see: motivational influences on visual perception. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006; 91(4):612-25. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.612. View

Balcetis E, Dunning D . Wishful seeing: more desired objects are seen as closer. Psychol Sci. 2010; 21(1):147-52. DOI: 10.1177/0956797609356283. View

Bar-Anan Y, Liberman N, Trope Y . The association between psychological distance and construal level: evidence from an implicit association test. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006; 135(4):609-22. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.609. View

Chan E, Maglio S . Coffee cues elevate arousal and reduce level of construal. Conscious Cogn. 2019; 70:57-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.02.007. View

Chan E, Wang Y . Mindfulness changes construal level: An experimental investigation. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019; 148(9):1656-1664. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000654. View

Collett T, Schwarz U, Sobel E . The interaction of oculomotor cues and stimulus size in stereoscopic death constancy. Perception. 1991; 20(6):733-54. DOI: 10.1068/p200733. View

Firestone C, Scholl B . Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for "top-down" effects. Behav Brain Sci. 2015; 39:e229. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X15000965. View

Fujita K, Trope Y, Liberman N, Levin-Sagi M . Construal levels and self-control. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006; 90(3):351-67. PMC: 3153425. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.351. View

10.

Hansen J, Trope Y . When time flies: how abstract and concrete mental construal affect the perception of time. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012; 142(2):336-47. DOI: 10.1037/a0029283. View

11.

Liberman N, Forster J . Distancing from experienced self: how global-versus-local perception affects estimation of psychological distance. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009; 97(2):203-16. DOI: 10.1037/a0015671. View

12.

Liberman N, Forster J . The effect of psychological distance on perceptual level of construal. Cogn Sci. 2011; 33(7):1330-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01061.x. View

13.

Liberman N, Trope Y . Traversing psychological distance. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014; 18(7):364-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.001. View

14.

McCrea S, Wieber F, Myers A . Construal level mind-sets moderate self- and social stereotyping. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011; 102(1):51-68. DOI: 10.1037/a0026108. View

15.

Proffitt D, Stefanucci J, Banton T, Epstein W . The role of effort in perceiving distance. Psychol Sci. 2003; 14(2):106-12. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01427. View

16.

Przybyszewski A . Vision: does top-down processing help us to see?. Curr Biol. 1998; 8(4):R135-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70080-6. View

17.

Rolls E . Top-down control of visual perception: attention in natural vision. Perception. 2008; 37(3):333-54. DOI: 10.1068/p5877. View

18.

Rosenholtz R, Huang J, Ehinger K . Rethinking the role of top-down attention in vision: effects attributable to a lossy representation in peripheral vision. Front Psychol. 2012; 3:13. PMC: 3272623. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00013. View

19.

Shaeffer E, Libby L, Eibach R . Changing visual perspective changes processing style: A distinct pathway by which imagery guides cognition. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015; 144(3):534-8. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000073. View

20.

Sousa R, Brenner E, Smeets J . Judging an unfamiliar object's distance from its retinal image size. J Vis. 2011; 11(9). DOI: 10.1167/11.9.10. View