» Articles » PMID: 37165395

Efficacy and Confounding Factors of CT Attenuation Value Differences in Distinguishing Acute and Old Vertebral Compression Fractures: a Retrospective Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2023 May 10
PMID 37165395
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the influence of various factors on CT attenuation values (HUs) of acute and old fracture vertebra, and to determine the efficacy of HU differences (△HUs) in the differentiation of the two type of fractures.

Materials And Methods: A total of 113 acute and 71 old fracture vertebrae confirmed by MRI were included. Four HUs measured at the mid-sagittal, upper 1/3 axial, mid-axial, and lower 1/3 axial planes of each vertebra were obtained. The △HUs between fracture vertebra and its control counterpart was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used and the areas under the ROC curve (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the efficacy of HUs and △HUs. To evaluate the effect of height reduction, region, age and gender on HUs and △HUs, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson correlation analysis and t-test were used.

Results: The HUs and △HUs at the upper 1/3 axial plane achieved the highest AUCs of 0.801 and 0.839, respectively. The HUs decreased gradually from Thoracic to Lumbar in control group of acute fracture. While no significant differences were found in the HUs among the 3 localizations in both fracture groups (all P > 0.05). The HUs were negatively correlated with age in all groups. The HUs of male were significantly higher than female patients in all groups (all P < 0.05). While △HU was not significantly different between males and females (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The vertebral HUs at the upper 1/3 axial plane are more likely to identify acute fractures. △HUs were beneficial in eliminating interfering factors.

Citing Articles

Feasibility of CT attenuation values in distinguishing acute ischemic stroke, old cerebral infarction and leukoaraiosis.

Peng Y, Luo C, Wang H, Sun K, Lin F, Wang J BMC Med Imaging. 2024; 24(1):160.

PMID: 38926814 PMC: 11201362. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01340-2.


Interobserver variability in the determination of bone mineral density in Hounsfield units from differently configured fields of measurement in the cancellous bone of vertebral bodies from elderly body donors.

Schroder G, Andresen J, Hiepe L, Schulze M, Kullen C, Kopetsch C J Orthop. 2023; 49:48-55.

PMID: 38075457 PMC: 10698493. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.11.061.

References
1.
Genant H, Wu C, van Kuijk C, Nevitt M . Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res. 1993; 8(9):1137-48. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650080915. View

2.
Dubuisson V, Voiglio E, Grenier N, Le Bras Y, Thoma M, Launay-Savary M . Imaging of non-traumatic abdominal emergencies in adults. J Visc Surg. 2015; 152(6 Suppl):S57-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2015.09.019. View

3.
Chang M, Lee S, Ha J, Park Y, Zhang H, Lee S . Predicting Bone Marrow Edema and Fracture Age in Vertebral Fragility Fractures Using MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020; 215(4):970-977. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.19.22606. View

4.
Tu S, Wang S, Cheng F, Chen Y . Extraction of gray-scale intensity distributions from micro computed tomography imaging for femoral cortical bone differentiation between low-magnesium and normal diets in a laboratory mouse model. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):8135. PMC: 6544618. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44610-8. View

5.
Han Y, Wang X, Wu J, Xu H, Zhang Z, Li K . Biomechanical finite element analysis of vertebral column resection and posterior unilateral vertebral resection and reconstruction osteotomy. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021; 16(1):88. PMC: 7845099. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02237-4. View