» Articles » PMID: 37163866

The Impact of Cigar Pack Size and Pricing Policies on Youth and Adult Cigar Use in the US

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2023 May 10
PMID 37163866
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Over 250 US localities have adopted cigar pack quantity and price policies. No empirical studies exist on their impact on tobacco use.

Methods: A quasi-experimental design was used to assess the impact of cigar policies on cigar and cigarette use among (1) Minnesota youth (n=569,528, triennially 2007-2019); (2) New York youth (n=111,236, annually 2000-2020), (3) New York adults (n=62,295, annually 2003-2019), and (4) District of Columbia (DC) adults (n=5027, annually 2015-2019). We estimated the county-level policy coverage for 15 local policies in Minnesota. Differences-in-differences approach was used to compare the policy in NYC with the rest of the state (no policy). We examined changes in DC use before and after policy implementation. Analyses adjust for sociodemographic characteristics.

Results: In Minnesota, youth in counties with a greater proportion of the population covered by a policy had lower odds of cigar use (AOR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.38-0.69). Similarly, adult cigar use in DC declined following policy enactment (AOR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.46-0.93). Cigarette use also decreased in both Minnesota and DC following policy enactment. However, in New York, the NYC policy did not have a significant impact on cigar use among youth (AOR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.47-1.93) or adults (AOR: 1.98; 95% CI: 0.85-1.37) in NYC compared to the rest of the state. The only significant effect in NYC was reduced odds for adult cigarette use (AOR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.68-0.92).

Conclusions: Findings suggest regulating cigar packaging could decrease cigar consumption without increasing cigarette consumption, but effects may differ across jurisdictions.

Citing Articles

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of population-level interventions to tackle smoking behaviour.

Akter S, Rahman M, Rouyard T, Aktar S, Nsashiyi R, Nakamura R Nat Hum Behav. 2024; 8(12):2367-2391.

PMID: 39375543 PMC: 11659173. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-02002-7.


The Impact of Modest Price Increases and Single Cigar Restrictions on Youth Cigar Use.

Jensen J, Ko H, Delnevo C, Azagba S Am J Prev Med. 2023; 66(1):159-163.

PMID: 37734482 PMC: 11066855. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.09.013.


Circumventing cigarette regulation: Product characteristics of cigarette-like cigarillos on the Dutch market.

Pennings J, Pauwels C, Schenk E, Talhout R Tob Induc Dis. 2023; 21:91.

PMID: 37456608 PMC: 10347962. DOI: 10.18332/tid/167476.

References
1.
Rostron B, Corey C, Gindi R . Cigar smoking prevalence and morbidity among US adults, 2000-2015. Prev Med Rep. 2019; 14:100821. PMC: 6378850. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100821. View

2.
Delnevo C, Hrywna M . "A whole 'nother smoke" or a cigarette in disguise: how RJ Reynolds reframed the image of little cigars. Am J Public Health. 2007; 97(8):1368-75. PMC: 1931466. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.101063. View

3.
Hawkins S, Kruzik C, OBrien M, Coley R . Flavoured tobacco product restrictions in Massachusetts associated with reductions in adolescent cigarette and e-cigarette use. Tob Control. 2021; 31(4):576-579. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056159. View

4.
Rose S, Anesetti-Rothermel A, Westneat S, van de Venne J, Folger S, Rahman B . Inequitable Distribution of FTP Marketing by Neighborhood Characteristics: Further Evidence for Targeted Marketing. Nicotine Tob Res. 2021; 24(4):484-492. PMC: 8887586. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntab222. View

5.
Smiley S, Kintz N, Rodriguez Y, Barahona R, Sussman S, Cruz T . Disparities in retail marketing for little cigars and cigarillos in Los Angeles, California. Addict Behav Rep. 2019; 9:100149. PMC: 6542377. DOI: 10.1016/j.abrep.2018.100149. View