» Articles » PMID: 37160644

Automated Facial Acne Lesion Detecting and Counting Algorithm for Acne Severity Evaluation and Its Utility in Assisting Dermatologists

Overview
Specialty Dermatology
Date 2023 May 9
PMID 37160644
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although lesion counting is an evaluation method that effectively analyzes facial acne severity, its usage is limited because of difficult implementation.

Objectives: We aimed to develop and validate an automated algorithm that detects and counts acne lesions by type, and to evaluate its clinical applicability as an assistance tool through a reader test.

Methods: A total of 20,699 lesions (closed and open comedones, papules, nodules/cysts, and pustules) were manually labeled on 1213 facial images of 398 facial acne photography sets (frontal and both lateral views) acquired from 258 patients and used for training and validating algorithms based on a convolutional neural network for classifying five classes of acne lesions or for binary classification into noninflammatory and inflammatory lesions.

Results: In the validation dataset, the highest mean average precision was 28.48 for the binary classification algorithm. Pearson's correlation of lesion counts between algorithm and ground-truth was 0.72 (noninflammatory) and 0.90 (inflammatory), respectively. In the reader test, eight readers (100.0%) detected and counted lesions more accurately using the algorithm compared with the reader-alone evaluation.

Conclusions: Overall, our algorithm demonstrated clinically applicable performance in detecting and counting facial acne lesions by type and its utility as an assistance tool for evaluating acne severity.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of an acne lesion detection and severity grading model for Chinese population in online and offline healthcare scenarios.

Gao N, Wang J, Zhao Z, Chu X, Lv B, Han G Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1119.

PMID: 39774300 PMC: 11706930. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84670-z.

References
1.
Zaenglein A . Acne Vulgaris. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379(14):1343-1352. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMcp1702493. View

2.
Suh D, Kim B, Min S, Lee D, Yoon M, Kim N . A multicenter epidemiological study of acne vulgaris in Korea. Int J Dermatol. 2011; 50(6):673-81. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04726.x. View

3.
Park S, Park M, Suh D, Kwon H, Min S, Lee S . Cross-sectional survey of awareness and behavioral pattern regarding acne and acne scar based on smartphone application. Int J Dermatol. 2015; 55(6):645-52. DOI: 10.1111/ijd.12853. View

4.
Tan J, Jones E, Allen E, Pripotnev S, Raza A, Wolfe B . Evaluation of essential clinical components and features of current acne global grading scales. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013; 69(5):754-761. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.07.029. View

5.
Cho S, Yang J, Suh D . Analysis of trends and status of physician-based evaluation methods in acne vulgaris from 2000 to 2019. J Dermatol. 2020; 48(1):42-48. DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.15613. View