Article: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by a novel two-medium compatible bichannel endoscopy system, technique note and preliminary clinical results

Purpose: Our team designed a novel two-medium compatible bichannel endoscopy system for spinal surgery, V-shape bichannel endoscopy (VBE) system. Hereby, this study will introduce minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with VBE system and report its preliminary clinical results.

Methods: Fifty-two participants, who accepted VBE-assisted TLIF surgery (VBE-TLIF) in our hospital were included in this study. The duration of operation, off-bed time, and days of hospitalization were recorded. Besides, the patient's preoperative and postoperative pain were evaluated via visual analog scale (VAS), the functional status was evaluated via Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) and modified MacNab criteria. Patients were asked to follow-up in the outpatient department at the 3rd, 6th, 12th, and 24th month after surgery. X-ray or CT was examined to evaluate the internal fixation position and interbody fusion result.

Results: All patients received unilateral decompression with an average operation duration of 178.49 ± 27.49 min. After the surgery, their VAS score of leg pain and back pain reduced significantly. At the last follow-up, the VAS score of leg pain and back pain was 0.80 ± 0.69 and 0.86 ± 0.75 separately. The difference shows statistically significant with p < 0.05. At the last follow-up, the ODI was 15.20 ± 5.75. According to modified MacNab criteria, 39 patients rated their function as excellent, and 10 patients were good. The overall satisfaction rate reached 94%.

Conclusion: The VBE system reported in the current study can complete TLIF surgery safely and effectively.

Citing Articles

Comparison of the clinical outcomes of VBE-TLIF versus MIS-TLIF for single-level degenerative lumbar diseases.

Wu X, Liu W, Xiao X, Fan Y, Gu G, Yu S Eur Spine J. 2024; 33(3):1120-1128.

PMID: 38347273 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-08096-3.

References

1.

Yavin D, Casha S, Wiebe S, Feasby T, Clark C, Isaacs A . Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neurosurgery. 2017; 80(5):701-715. DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyw162. View

2.

Kim C, Chung C, Choi Y, Kim M, Yim D, Yang S . The Long-term Reoperation Rate Following Surgery for Lumbar Herniated Intervertebral Disc Disease: A Nationwide Sample Cohort Study With a 10-year Follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019; 44(19):1382-1389. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003065. View

3.

Gao Y, Zhang Y, Shi L, Gao W, Li Y, Chen H . What are Risk Factors of Postoperative Pneumonia in Geriatric Individuals after Hip Fracture Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Orthop Surg. 2022; 15(1):38-52. PMC: 9837248. DOI: 10.1111/os.13631. View

4.

Ahn Y, Youn M, Heo D . Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comprehensive review. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019; 16(5):373-380. DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1610388. View

5.

Wagner R, Haefner M . Uniportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Neurospine. 2020; 17(Suppl 1):S120-S128. PMC: 7410390. DOI: 10.14245/ns.2040130.065. View

6.

Heo D, Son S, Eum J, Park C . Fully endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion using a percutaneous unilateral biportal endoscopic technique: technical note and preliminary clinical results. Neurosurg Focus. 2017; 43(2):E8. DOI: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17146. View

7.

Shen J . Fully Endoscopic Lumbar Laminectomy and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Under Local Anesthesia with Conscious Sedation: A Case Series. World Neurosurg. 2019; 127:e745-e750. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.257. View

8.

Park M, Park S, Son S, Park W, Choi S . Clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) compared with conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): 1-year follow-up. Neurosurg Rev. 2019; 42(3):753-761. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-019-01114-3. View

9.

Diaz R, Savardekar A, Brougham J, Terrell D, Sin A . Investigating the efficacy of allograft cellular bone matrix for spinal fusion: a systematic review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus. 2021; 50(6):E11. DOI: 10.3171/2021.3.FOCUS2179. View

10.

Villavicencio A, Nelson E, Rajpal S, Beasley K, Burneikiene S . Prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial comparing PEEK and allograft spacers in patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgeries. Spine J. 2021; 22(1):84-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.06.005. View

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion by a Novel Two-medium Compatible Bichannel Endoscopy System, Technique Note and Preliminary Clinical Results