» Articles » PMID: 37157025

Efficiency of Mapping Epistatic Quantitative Trait Loci

Overview
Specialty Genetics
Date 2023 May 8
PMID 37157025
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Most theoretical studies on epistatic QTL mapping have shown that this procedure is powerful, efficient to control the false positive rate (FPR), and precise to localize QTLs. The objective of this simulation-based study was to show that mapping epistatic QTLs is not an almost-perfect process. We simulated 50 samples of 400 F plants/recombinant inbred lines, genotyped for 975 SNPs distributed in 10 chromosomes of 100 cM. The plants were phenotyped for grain yield, assuming 10 epistatic QTLs and 90 minor genes. Adopting basic procedures of r/qtl package, we maximized the power of detection for QTLs (56-74%, on average) but associated with a very high FPR (65%) and a low detection power for the epistatic pairs (7%). Increasing the average detection power for epistatic pairs (14%) highly increased the related FPR. Adopting a procedure to find the best balance between power and FPR, there was a significant decrease in the power of QTL detection (17-31%, on average), associated with a low average detection power for epistatic pairs (8%) and an average FPR of 31% for QTLs and 16% for epistatic pairs. The main reasons for these negative results are a simplified specification of the coefficients of epistatic effects, as theoretically proved, and the effects of minor genes since 2/3 of the FPR for QTLs were due to them. We hope that this study, including the partial derivation of the coefficients of epistatic effects, motivates investigations on how to increase the power of detection for epistatic pairs, effectively controlling the FPR.

Citing Articles

Discovery and validation of SSR marker-based QTL governing fresh pod yield in dolichos bean (Lablab purpureus L. Sweet).

Gonal B, Sampangi R, Mugali K, Chindi S, Chandana B, Satish H Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8613.

PMID: 40075147 PMC: 11904200. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-90558-3.


A simulation-based assessment of the efficiency of QTL mapping under environment and genotype x environment interaction effects.

David G, Viana J, Dias K PLoS One. 2023; 18(11):e0295245.

PMID: 38033088 PMC: 10688852. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295245.


A Comparison of Methods to Estimate Additive-by-Additive-by-Additive of QTL×QTL×QTL Interaction Effects by Monte Carlo Simulation Studies.

Cyplik A, Bocianowski J Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(12).

PMID: 37373191 PMC: 10298025. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241210043.

References
1.
Chen J, Tai L, Luo L, Xiang J, Zhao Z . Mapping QTLs for yield component traits using overwintering cultivated rice. J Genet. 2021; 100. View

2.
Mackay T . Epistasis and quantitative traits: using model organisms to study gene-gene interactions. Nat Rev Genet. 2013; 15(1):22-33. PMC: 3918431. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3627. View

3.
Jannink J, Jansen R . Mapping epistatic quantitative trait loci with one-dimensional genome searches. Genetics. 2001; 157(1):445-54. PMC: 1461463. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/157.1.445. View

4.
Viana J, Pereira H, Mundim G, Piepho H, Silva F . Efficiency of genomic prediction of non-assessed single crosses. Heredity (Edinb). 2017; 120(4):283-295. PMC: 5842238. DOI: 10.1038/s41437-017-0027-0. View

5.
Yi N, Xu S . Mapping quantitative trait loci with epistatic effects. Genet Res. 2002; 79(2):185-98. DOI: 10.1017/s0016672301005511. View