» Articles » PMID: 37156973

Sensitivity to Pulse Rate and Amplitude Modulation in an Animal Model of the Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI)

Overview
Date 2023 May 8
PMID 37156973
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) is an auditory neuroprosthesis that provides hearing by electrically stimulating the cochlear nucleus (CN) of the brainstem. Our previous study (McInturff et al., 2022) showed that single-pulse stimulation of the dorsal (D)CN subdivision with low levels of current evokes responses that have early latencies, different than the late response patterns observed from stimulation of the ventral (V)CN. How these differing responses encode more complex stimuli, such as pulse trains and amplitude modulated (AM) pulses, has not been explored. Here, we compare responses to pulse train stimulation of the DCN and VCN, and show that VCN responses, measured in the inferior colliculus (IC), have less adaption, higher synchrony, and higher cross-correlation. However, with high-level DCN stimulation, responses become like those to VCN stimulation, supporting our earlier hypothesis that current spreads from electrodes on the DCN to excite neurons located in the VCN. To AM pulses, stimulation of the VCN elicits responses with larger vector strengths and gain values especially in the high-CF portion of the IC. Additional analysis using neural measures of modulation thresholds indicate that these measures are lowest for VCN. Human ABI users with low modulation thresholds, who score best on comprehension tests, may thus have electrode arrays that stimulate the VCN. Overall, the results show that the VCN has superior response characteristics and suggest that it should be the preferred target for ABI electrode arrays in humans.

Citing Articles

Differential optogenetic activation of the auditory midbrain in freely moving behaving mice.

Rogalla M, Seibert A, Sleeboom J, Hildebrandt K Front Syst Neurosci. 2023; 17:1222176.

PMID: 37719023 PMC: 10501139. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2023.1222176.


Differential projections from the cochlear nucleus to the inferior colliculus in the mouse.

Ryugo D, Milinkeviciute G Front Neural Circuits. 2023; 17:1229746.

PMID: 37554670 PMC: 10405501. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2023.1229746.

References
1.
Young E, Brownell W . Responses to tones and noise of single cells in dorsal cochlear nucleus of unanesthetized cats. J Neurophysiol. 1976; 39(2):282-300. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1976.39.2.282. View

2.
Shivdasani M, Mauger S, Rathbone G, Paolini A . Inferior colliculus responses to multichannel microstimulation of the ventral cochlear nucleus: implications for auditory brain stem implants. J Neurophysiol. 2007; 99(1):1-13. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00629.2007. View

3.
Middlebrooks J, Snyder R . Selective electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve activates a pathway specialized for high temporal acuity. J Neurosci. 2010; 30(5):1937-46. PMC: 2828779. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4949-09.2010. View

4.
Chung Y, Hancock K, Nam S, Delgutte B . Coding of electric pulse trains presented through cochlear implants in the auditory midbrain of awake rabbit: comparison with anesthetized preparations. J Neurosci. 2014; 34(1):218-31. PMC: 3866485. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2084-13.2014. View

5.
Webster D . The spiral ganglion and cochlear nuclei of deafness mice. Hear Res. 1985; 18(1):19-27. DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(85)90107-8. View