» Articles » PMID: 37155633

Opinions of Former Jail Residents About Self-collection of SARS-CoV-2 Specimens, Paired with Wastewater Surveillance: A Qualitative Study Rapidly Examining Acceptability of COVID-19 Mitigation Measures

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2023 May 8
PMID 37155633
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In year one of the COVID-19 epidemic, the incidence of infection for US carceral populations was 5.5-fold higher than that in the community. Prior to the rapid roll out of a comprehensive jail surveillance program of Wastewater-Based Surveillance (WBS) and individual testing for SARS-CoV-2, we sought the perspectives of formerly incarcerated individuals regarding mitigation strategies against COVID-19 to inform acceptability of the new program. In focus groups, participants discussed barriers to their receiving COVID-19 testing and vaccination. We introduced WBS and individual nasal self-testing, then queried if wastewater testing to improve surveillance of emerging outbreaks before case numbers surged, and specimen self-collection, would be valued. The participants' input gives insight into ways to improve the delivery of COVID-19 interventions. Hearing the voices of those with lived experiences of incarceration is critical to understanding their views on infection control strategies and supports including justice-involved individuals in decision-making processes regarding jail-based interventions.

Citing Articles

Four Models of Wastewater-Based Monitoring for SARS-CoV-2 Complementing Individual Screening in Jail Settings.

Kennedy S, Saber L, Brown V, Boehm R, Olotu A, Osei J Am J Public Health. 2024; 114(11):1232-1241.

PMID: 39357007 PMC: 11447785. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307785.


Dynamic contact networks of residents of an urban jail in the era of SARS-CoV-2.

Jenness S, Wallrafen-Sam K, Schneider I, Kennedy S, Akiyama M, Spaulding A Epidemics. 2024; 47:100772.

PMID: 38776713 PMC: 11196925. DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100772.


Mitigation through on-site testing & education among formerly incarcerated individuals against Covid-19 - The MOSAIC study: Design and rationale.

Ackerman M, Holmes C, Antigua J, Riback L, Zhang C, Walker J Contemp Clin Trials. 2023; 136:107406.

PMID: 38097063 PMC: 11055630. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107406.


Dynamic Contact Networks of Residents of an Urban Jail in the Era of SARS-CoV-2.

Jenness S, Wallrafen-Sam K, Schneider I, Kennedy S, Akiyama M, Spaulding A medRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37873313 PMC: 10593002. DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.29.23296359.

References
1.
Taylor B, Henshall C, Kenyon S, Litchfield I, Greenfield S . Can rapid approaches to qualitative analysis deliver timely, valid findings to clinical leaders? A mixed methods study comparing rapid and thematic analysis. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(10):e019993. PMC: 6194404. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019993. View

2.
Gostin L . Biomedical research involving prisoners: ethical values and legal regulation. JAMA. 2007; 297(7):737-40. DOI: 10.1001/jama.297.7.737. View

3.
Erlich H, GELFAND D, Sninsky J . Recent advances in the polymerase chain reaction. Science. 1991; 252(5013):1643-51. DOI: 10.1126/science.2047872. View

4.
Ogale Y, Yeh P, Kennedy C, Toskin I, Narasimhan M . Self-collection of samples as an additional approach to deliver testing services for sexually transmitted infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob Health. 2019; 4(2):e001349. PMC: 6509609. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001349. View

5.
Gale R, Wu J, Erhardt T, Bounthavong M, Reardon C, Damschroder L . Comparison of rapid vs in-depth qualitative analytic methods from a process evaluation of academic detailing in the Veterans Health Administration. Implement Sci. 2019; 14(1):11. PMC: 6359833. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0853-y. View