» Articles » PMID: 37154999

A Multiparametric Clinic-ultrasomics Nomogram for Predicting Extremity Soft-tissue Tumor Malignancy: a Combined Retrospective and Prospective Bicentric Study

Overview
Journal Radiol Med
Specialty Radiology
Date 2023 May 8
PMID 37154999
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We aimed at building and testing a multiparametric clinic-ultrasomics nomogram for prediction of malignant extremity soft-tissue tumors (ESTTs).

Materials And Methods: This combined retrospective and prospective bicentric study assessed the performance of the multiparametric clinic-ultrasomics nomogram to predict the malignancy of ESTTs, when compared with a conventional clinic-radiologic nomogram. A dataset of grayscale ultrasound (US), color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI), and elastography images for 209 ESTTs were retrospectively enrolled from one hospital, and divided into the training and validation cohorts. A multiparametric ultrasomics signature was built based on multimodal ultrasomic features extracted from the grayscale US, CDFI, and elastography images of ESTTs in the training cohort. Another conventional radiologic score was built based on multimodal US features as interpreted by two experienced radiologists. Two nomograms that integrated clinical risk factors and the multiparameter ultrasomics signature or conventional radiologic score were respectively developed. Performance of the two nomograms was validated in the retrospective validation cohort, and tested in a prospective dataset of 51 ESTTs from the second hospital.

Results: The multiparametric ultrasomics signature was built based on seven grayscale ultrasomic features, three CDFI ultrasomic features, and one elastography ultrasomic feature. The conventional radiologic score was built based on five multimodal US characteristics. Predictive performance of the multiparametric clinic-ultrasomics nomogram was superior to that of the conventional clinic-radiologic nomogram in the training (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.970 vs. 0.890, p = 0.006), validation (AUC: 0.946 vs. 0.828, p = 0.047) and test (AUC: 0.934 vs. 0.842, p = 0.040) cohorts, respectively. Decision curve analysis of combined training, validation and test cohorts revealed that the multiparametric clinic-ultrasomics nomogram had a higher overall net benefit than the conventional clinic-radiologic model.

Conclusion: The multiparametric clinic-ultrasomics nomogram can accurately predict the malignancy of ESTTs.

Citing Articles

A practical risk stratification system based on ultrasonography and clinical characteristics for predicting the malignancy of soft tissue masses.

Zhang Y, Wu M, Hu Y, Peng X, Ma Q, Mao C Insights Imaging. 2024; 15(1):226.

PMID: 39320574 PMC: 11424597. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01802-9.


Ultrasomics differentiation of malignant and benign focal liver lesions based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Hu H, Li M, Zhang J, Ruan S, Wu S, Lin X BMC Med Imaging. 2024; 24(1):242.

PMID: 39285357 PMC: 11403768. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01426-x.


A machine learning model based on clinical features and ultrasound radiomics features for pancreatic tumor classification.

Yao S, Yao D, Huang Y, Qin S, Chen Q Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1381822.

PMID: 38957447 PMC: 11218542. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1381822.


The Combined Use of Inflammation Markers, Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score, and Sarculator Nomogram in Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Multicenter Observational Study.

Nakamura T, Takenaka S, Outani H, Hagi T, Tamiya H, Imura Y Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(5).

PMID: 38473433 PMC: 10930663. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16051077.

References
1.
Souza F, Cardoso F, Cortes C, Rosenberg A, Subhawong T . Soft Tissue Tumors: Imaging Features of Primary Soft Tissue Malignancies. Radiol Clin North Am. 2022; 60(2):283-299. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2021.11.007. View

2.
Wilke B, Goulding K, Sherman C, Houdek M . Soft Tissue Tumors: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-up from the Orthopedic Oncologist Perspective. Radiol Clin North Am. 2022; 60(2):253-262. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2021.11.005. View

3.
Tukiainen E, Bohling T, Huuhtanen R . Soft tissue sarcoma of the trunk and extremities. Scand J Surg. 2004; 92(4):257-63. DOI: 10.1177/145749690309200404. View

4.
Baili P, Di Salvo F, Marcos-Gragera R, Siesling S, Mallone S, Santaquilani M . Age and case mix-standardised survival for all cancer patients in Europe 1999-2007: Results of EUROCARE-5, a population-based study. Eur J Cancer. 2015; 51(15):2120-2129. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.025. View

5.
Ballhause T, Reiter A, Korthaus A, Frosch K, Schlickewei C, Priemel M . Diagnostic delay in soft tissue tumors: a single-center study of a university cancer center with a focus on health services research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):452. PMC: 8988367. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07891-w. View