» Articles » PMID: 37153932

Bond Strength and Failure Mode of Glass Fiber Posts with Different Surface Treatments Prior to Silanization: An Comparative Study

Abstract

Aim: The use of chemical agents in the surface treatment of glass fiber posts can improve their bond strength to the root canal. The aim of this study was to assess the bond strength and failure mode of glass fiber posts that received different surface treatments prior to silanization.

Materials And Methods: In this cross-sectional and experimental study, 50 human lower premolar roots were randomly divided into five groups and subsequently prepared to receive the cementation of a fiberglass post prior to silanization. They were distributed as group 1 (with 24% hydrogen peroxide), group 2 (with 37% phosphoric acid), group 3 (with 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride for 2 minutes), group 4 (with 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride for 6 minutes), and group 5 (without pretreatment). After cementation, the roots were sectioned into two discs for each cervical, middle, and apical region. Bond strength was assessed using the technique. Adhesive, mixed, and cohesive failure modes were also assessed. For data analysis, ANOVA and Tukey's tests were used, as well as Pearson's chi-square test. A significance of < 0.05 was considered in all statistical analyses.

Results: When comparing the bond strength of root regions, significant differences were obtained in groups pretreated with phosphoric acid ( = 0.018) and acidulated phosphate fluoride for 2 and 6 minutes ( = 0.001 and = 0.000, respectively). Furthermore, significant differences were obtained between posts treated only with silane and those that received phosphoric acid pretreatment ( = 0.006) and acidulated phosphate fluoride for 6 minutes ( = 0.001). Significant association of mixed failure mode was observed with hydrogen peroxide ( = 0.014) and phosphoric acid ( = 0.006) pretreatments. Cohesive failure was significantly associated with acidulated phosphate fluoride pretreatment for 2 minutes ( = 0.032) and with posts that did not receive treatment prior to silanization ( = 0.000).

Conclusion: Posts treated only with silane and pretreated with hydrogen peroxide and acidulated phosphate fluoride for 2 minutes presented significantly higher bond strength with respect to those pretreated with phosphoric acid and acidulated phosphate fluoride for 6 minutes. However, acidulated phosphate fluoride for 2 minutes and silane were associated with a better bonding type.

Citing Articles

Tensile Strength and Elastic Modulus of Gutta-percha Cones Disinfected with Sodium Hypochlorite at Different Immersion Times: An Comparative Study.

Bellido-Guzman R, Ladera-Castaneda M, Castro-Perez Vargas A, Lopez-Gurreonero C, Cornejo-Pinto A, Aliaga-Marinas A J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2024; 14(1):69-77.

PMID: 38559640 PMC: 10980304. DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_106_22.

References
1.
Seballos V, Barreto M, da Rosa R, Machado E, Valandro L, Kaizer O . Effect of Post-Space Irrigation with NaOCl And CaOCl at Different Concentrations on the Bond Strength of Posts Cemented with a Self-Adhesive Resin Cement. Braz Dent J. 2018; 29(5):446-451. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201801955. View

2.
Schwartz R . Adhesive dentistry and endodontics. Part 2: bonding in the root canal system-the promise and the problems: a review. J Endod. 2006; 32(12):1125-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.08.003. View

3.
Elnaghy A, Elsaka S . Effect of surface treatments on the flexural properties and adhesion of glass fiber-reinforced composite post to self-adhesive luting agent and radicular dentin. Odontology. 2014; 104(1):60-7. DOI: 10.1007/s10266-014-0184-z. View

4.
Chirila M, Dimitriu B, Bartok R, Amza O, Serban A, Suciu I . Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with resin post reinforced with glass fiber. J Med Life. 2021; 14(1):81-85. PMC: 7982254. DOI: 10.25122/jml-2020-0180. View

5.
Kukiattrakoon B, Thammasitboon K . Optimal acidulated phosphate fluoride gel etching time for surface treatment of feldspathic porcelain: on shear bond strength to resin composite. Eur J Dent. 2012; 6(1):63-9. PMC: 3252805. View