» Articles » PMID: 37152333

The Frequency of POCUS in the Treatment of Sepsis in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview
Journal POCUS J
Date 2023 May 8
PMID 37152333
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is ubiquitous in the modern emergency department (ED). POCUS can be helpful in the management of patients with sepsis in many ways including determining the cause of sepsis, assessing fluid status, guiding resuscitation, and performing procedures. However, the frequency and manner in which POCUS is incorporated into the care of septic patients in community emergency medicine remains unclear. To evaluate POCUS frequency and exam types used in the care of patients with sepsis in two community EDs in Southern California. We performed a retrospective analysis of 5,264 ED visits with a diagnosis of sepsis at two community emergency departments between January 2014 and December 2018. Patients 18 years or older who were diagnosed with sepsis and had either lactate ≥ 4 mmol, a documented mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 65 mmHg, or a systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 mmHg were included. Charts were reviewed to determine if POCUS was used during the ED evaluation. Primary outcomes were frequency of POCUS use in the cohort, change in POCUS use over the study period, and the types of exams performed. POCUS was used in 21% of encounters meeting inclusion criteria and was positively correlated with ED arrival year (OR = 1.09; CI 1.04, 1.15; p=0.001). The most common POCUS exam was ultrasound-guided central line placement, with the next most common exams being cardiac, followed by inferior vena cava (IVC). Only the frequency of cardiac, IVC, lung and Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) exams were found to increase significantly over the study period. Total POCUS use increased significantly in this cohort of septic patients over the study period due to more cardiac, IVC, lung and FAST exams being performed.

Citing Articles

Does Point-of-Care Ultrasound Affect Fluid Resuscitation Volume in Patients with Septic Shock: A Retrospective Review.

Ablordeppey E, Zhao A, Ruggeri J, Hassan A, Wallace L, Agarwal M Emerg Med Int. 2024; 2024:5675066.

PMID: 38742136 PMC: 11090677. DOI: 10.1155/2024/5675066.

References
1.
Lanspa M, Burk R, Wilson E, Hirshberg E, Grissom C, Brown S . Echocardiogram-guided resuscitation versus early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of septic shock: a randomized, controlled, feasibility trial. J Intensive Care. 2018; 6:50. PMC: 6090604. DOI: 10.1186/s40560-018-0319-3. View

2.
Guerin L, Vieillard-Baron A . The Use of Ultrasound in Caring for Patients with Sepsis. Clin Chest Med. 2016; 37(2):299-307. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccm.2016.01.005. View

3.
Atkinson P, Milne J, Diegelmann L, Lamprecht H, Stander M, Lussier D . Does Point-of-Care Ultrasonography Improve Clinical Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients With Undifferentiated Hypotension? An International Randomized Controlled Trial From the SHoC-ED Investigators. Ann Emerg Med. 2018; 72(4):478-489. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.04.002. View

4.
Buchman T, Simpson S, Sciarretta K, Finne K, Sowers N, Collier M . Sepsis Among Medicare Beneficiaries: 1. The Burdens of Sepsis, 2012-2018. Crit Care Med. 2020; 48(3):276-288. PMC: 7017943. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004224. View

5.
Randazzo M, Snoey E, Levitt M, Binder K . Accuracy of emergency physician assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and central venous pressure using echocardiography. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10(9):973-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00654.x. View